• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The impact of influenza vaccination requirements for hospital personnel in California: Knowledge, attitudes, and vaccine uptake

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Am J Infect Control. 2014 Mar;42(3):288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2013.09.030.
The impact of influenza vaccination requirements for hospital personnel in California: Knowledge, attitudes, and vaccine uptake.
Harris KM1, Uscher-Pines L2, Han B3, Lindley MC4, Lorick SA4.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Seasonal influenza infections are a leading cause of illness, death, and lost productivity. Vaccinating health care personnel (HCP) can reduce transmission of influenza virus to patients and reduce influenza-related absenteeism, enabling the health care system to meet elevated demand for care during influenza outbreaks.
OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated the impact of California's 2006 influenza vaccination requirement for hospital workers (requiring vaccination or signed declinations) on uptake and vaccination-related attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge among hospital HCP.
METHODS:

We used a causal difference-in-differences approach to compare changes over the prior 10 years in the self-reported frequency of influenza vaccination for California hospital HCP and those from other states without similar laws using data from a stratified sample (N = 3,529) of HCP drawn from online survey panels. We also examined cross-sectional differences in awareness of vaccination policies, promotion efforts, and attitudes toward influenza vaccination. All analyses used propensity score weighting to balance the observable characteristics of the 2 samples.
RESULTS:

We found that compared with their counterparts in other states, California hospital HCP were (1) more likely to report working under a formal written policy for influenza vaccination, (2) no more likely to be vaccinated, and (3) less likely to report working for an employer who provided financial incentives for vaccination or rewarded or recognized employees for being vaccinated.
CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that state-level vaccination requirements such as those enacted by California, may not be sufficient to increase uptake among hospital HCP.

Copyright ? 2014 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Difference-in-difference, Hospitals, Immunization, State policy, Survey research

PMID:
24581018
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24581018
 
Back
Top Bottom