• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Study reveals urban smoke absorbs sunlight, exacerbating climate warming rather than cooling as erroneous climate models predicted

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
http://www.lanl.gov/discover/news-r...tember/09.30-urban-smoke-absorbs-sunlight.php
[h=1]Study reveals urban smoke absorbs sunlight, exacerbating climate warming[/h] Cloaking urban areas and wildfire zones, tiny smoke particles suspended in the atmosphere have a sizeable effect on our climate. [h=3]First field demonstration of warming caused by soot and brown carbon[/h] LOS ALAMOS, N.M., Sept. 30, 2015?Cloaking urban areas and wildfire zones, tiny smoke particles suspended in the atmosphere have a sizeable effect on our climate. But the exact effect of many of these aerosols?such as how much sunlight they absorb, thus warming Earth, or reflecting back to space and so cooling Earth?is very uncertain.
?The new measurements resolve carbon particles that are of several types, each with its own effect on climate,? said project leader Manvendra Dubey of Los Alamos National Laboratory.
?Black carbon, from both city-related biomass combustion, is the most sunlight absorbing. Brown carbon, from sources such as residential wood combustion and forest fires, is the component that is missing in most climate models and can be a significant absorber of sunlight, making it as bad for climate warming as black carbon,? Dubey said.
?In fact,? he noted, ?brown carbon is erroneously treated as organic carbon in climate models that show it scattering sunlight to exert a cooling effect. Recognizing brown carbon's heating effects will require significant adjustment to current climate models. Furthermore, we have determined that organic carbon coatings amplify black carbon?s light absorbing power by focusing sunlight, which exacerbates their warming effect.?
The new evidence appears in a paper published today by Nature Communications. Notably, the analysis reveals that climate models could be minimizing smoke?s warming effect because the models did not factor in the regionally specific features that determine the light-absorbing carbon particle?s outer coatings and its composition, both of which control how strongly particles absorb sunlight....
 
Back
Top