• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Stroke . Effect of COVID-19 on Emergent Stroke Care: A Regional Experience

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Stroke


. 2020 Jul 8;STROKEAHA120030499.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030499. Online ahead of print.
Effect of COVID-19 on Emergent Stroke Care: A Regional Experience


Jessica Hsiao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emily Sayles[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eleni Antzoulatos[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robert J Stanton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Heidi Sucharew[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Joseph P Broderick[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stacie L Demel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew L Flaherty[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aaron W Grossman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Charles Kircher[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Natalie Kreitzer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Katrina Peariso[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Charles J Prestigiacomo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peyman Shirani[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kyle B Walsh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Holly Lampton[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Opeolu Adeoye[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Pooja Khatri[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background and purpose: Anecdotal evidence suggests that the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic mitigation efforts may inadvertently discourage patients from seeking treatment for stroke with resultant increased morbidity and mortality. Analysis of regional data, while hospital capacities for acute stroke care remained fully available, offers an opportunity to assess this. We report regional Stroke Team acute activations and reperfusion treatments during COVID-19 mitigation activities.
Methods: Using case log data prospectively collected by a Stroke Team exclusively serving ≈2 million inhabitants and 30 healthcare facilities, we retrospectively reviewed volumes of consultations and reperfusion treatments for acute ischemic stroke. We compared volumes before and after announcements of COVID-19 mitigation measures and the prior calendar year.
Results: Compared with the 10 weeks prior, stroke consultations declined by 39% (95% CI, 32%-46%) in the 5 weeks after announcement of statewide school and restaurant closures in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Results compared with the prior year and time trend analyses were consistent. Reperfusion treatments also appeared to decline by 31% (95% CI, 3%-51%), and specifically thrombolysis by 33% (95% CI, 4%-55%), but this finding had less precision.
Conclusions: Upon the announcement of measures to mitigate COVID-19, regional acute stroke consultations declined significantly. Reperfusion treatment rates, particularly thrombolysis, also appeared to decline qualitatively, and this finding requires further study. Urgent public education is necessary to mitigate a possible crisis of avoiding essential emergency care due to COVID-19.

Keywords: pandemics; reperfusion; restaurants; stroke; viruses.
 
Back
Top Bottom