• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Transl Med . A replicating RNA vaccine protects cynomolgus macaques against lethal clade 2.3.4.4b influenza A H5N1 virus challenge

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Transl Med


. 2025 Oct 8;17(819):eadw4646.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adw4646. Epub 2025 Oct 8. A replicating RNA vaccine protects cynomolgus macaques against lethal clade 2.3.4.4b influenza A H5N1 virus challenge

David W Hawman[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amanda Griffin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Natalie McCarthy[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Atsushi Okumura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shanna S Leventhal[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mahati Agumamidi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michael Chorabik Jr[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ekaterina Altynova[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Matthew Lewis[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Troy Hinkley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], E Taylor Stone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nikole Warner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stephanie Park[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jamie Lovaglio[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Brian J Smith[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Patrick Hanley[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Greg Saturday[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carl Shaia[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chad Clancy[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kyle Rosenke[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jesse H Erasmus[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Heinz Feldmann[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

In early 2024, clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A H5N1 virus was detected in United States dairy cattle. Although so far the public health threat of contemporary clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus strains remains low, continued circulation in mammals and frequent spillover into humans poses a threat of pandemic H5N1. The United States and other countries have stockpiled vaccines and have plans in place to rapidly produce additional vaccine doses should a pandemic H5N1 virus emerge. However, the continued antigenic drift of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 antigens compared with historical antigens used by stockpiled vaccines has raised questions of whether these vaccines will confer protection or whether stockpiles need to be updated. We recently evaluated a replicating RNA (repRNA) vaccine against lethal contemporary 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus challenge in mice and found that a homologous, but not historical, H5 hemagglutinin (HA)-based vaccine conferred protection. Here, we further evaluated the protective capacity of a repRNA expressing the contemporary 2.3.4.4b HA or a repRNA expressing a historical H5 HA (A/Vietnam/1203/2004) in a recently developed lethal nonhuman primate (NHP) challenge model. We found that both vaccines conferred robust protection against lethal 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus challenge, reducing viral loads and signs of respiratory illness. Our data show that the repRNA platform can elicit protective immunity against lethal influenza virus challenge in NHPs and that historical H5 HAs can elicit cross-protective immunity.


 
Back
Top Bottom