• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Total Environ. Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 29;731:139052. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052. [Epub ahead of print]
Does lockdown reduce air pollution? Evidence from 44 cities in northern China.


Bao R[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhang A[SUP]2[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

Responding to the ongoing novel coronavirus (agent of COVID-19) outbreak, China implemented "the largest quarantine in human history" in Wuhan on 23 January 2020. Similar quarantine measures were imposed on other Chinese cities within days. Human mobility and relevant production and consumption activities have since decreased significantly. As a likely side effect of this decrease, many regions have recorded significant reductions in air pollution. We employed daily air pollution data and Intracity Migration Index (IMI) data form Baidu between 1 January and 21 March 2020 for 44 cities in northern China to examine whether, how, and to what extent travel restrictions affected air quality. On the basis of this quantitative analysis, we reached the following conclusions: (1) The reduction of air pollution was strongly associated with travel restrictions during this pandemic-on average, the air quality index (AQI) decreased by 7.80%, and five air pollutants (i.e., SO[SUB]2[/SUB], PM[SUB]2.5[/SUB], PM[SUB]10[/SUB], NO[SUB]2[/SUB], and CO) decreased by 6.76%, 5.93%, 13.66%, 24.67%, and 4.58%, respectively. (2) Mechanism analysis illustrated that the lockdowns of 44 cities reduced human movements by 69.85%, and a reduction in the AQI, PM[SUB]2.5[/SUB], and CO was partially mediated by human mobility, and SO[SUB]2[/SUB], PM[SUB]10[/SUB], and NO[SUB]2[/SUB] were completely mediated. (3) Our findings highlight the importance of understanding the role of green production and consumption.
Copyright ? 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

Air pollution; COVID-19; Dynamic panel; Human mobility; Travel restriction


PMID:32413655DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139052
 
Back
Top Bottom