• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Rep . The sperm quality change in 6 months recovery from COVID-19: a retrospective observational study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep


. 2025 Oct 21;15(1):36713.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-20637-y. The sperm quality change in 6 months recovery from COVID-19: a retrospective observational study

Xiaoli Zhao[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Yu Zhao[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Nan Jiang[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kaixi Li[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Jiaqi Xu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ruihong Ma[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Zuqian Luan[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Tian Xia[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has yielded substantial evidence indicating that SARS-CoV-2 may impair reproductive function, particularly by adversely affecting sperm quality. Given the potential implications for male reproductive health, it is crucial to assess the reversibility of such damage, determine the precise recovery timeline, and evaluate post-infection health parameters. Male patients who had undergone sperm analysis prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled to evaluate longitudinal changes in sperm quality during a 6-month recovery period. Sperm parameters were collected at five consecutive time points: before infection and at 1, 2, 3, 6 months post-infection. Additionally, quality of life (QoL), psychological status, and sexual function were evaluated via standardized questionnaires within the first month after infection. The primary outcomes were sperm concentration and progressive motility. Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) were applied for statistical analysis of repeated measures, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess temporal trends in sperm recovery. 1009 subjects underwent sperm analysis during widespread COVID-19 transmission, from April 2022 to January 2023. Among them, 139 eligible patients completed sperm analysis in the first month post-infection, with 92 (66%) patients were tested in the second month, 72 (52%) patients in the third month, and 64 (46%) patients completed the sperm analysis in the sixth month. The final analytical cohort comprised 74 participants with complete pre-infection baselines and ≥ 3 post-COVID-19 semen analyses at specified intervals (1, 2, 3, 6 months). Sperm concentration [39.22 (95% CI 32.02-46.41)] and progressive motility [36.41 (95% CI 32.29-40.53)] showed a significant decline at 1-month post-infection compared to pre-infection levels. Partial recovery occurred during the second and third months, though values remained significantly lower than baseline pre-infection levels at 6-month follow-up (p < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated median recovery times of 5 months (95% CI 4.57-5.43) for sperm concentration and 3 months (95% CI 2.08-3.82) for progressive motility, with no age-dependent differences observed (log-rank p > 0.05). Comprehensive assessments showed preserved psychological status, quality of life, and urogenital function at 1-month post-infection. Sperm quality was negatively impacted by COVID-19 infection, but temporary, with a recovery period of 3-5 months. Furthermore, no abnormalities were observed in men's psychological, urinary symptoms, or sexual function during the initial month following recovery from infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; Prostate symptoms; Psychological states; Sexual function; Sperm quality.

 
Back
Top