• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Prev Vet Med . Factors associated with avian influenza infections in indoor commercial poultry farm settings: A systematic review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Prev Vet Med


. 2025 Jun 25:243:106606.
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106606. Online ahead of print. Factors associated with avian influenza infections in indoor commercial poultry farm settings: A systematic review

Elvira Meni Maria Gkrinia[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa Kohnle[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christina Joanne Atchison[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Wendy Kwok[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Avian influenza (AI) poses a significant threat to animal and human health, as well as to the poultry industry, with demonstrably pandemic potential. Intensive farming has been associated with conditions that may facilitate the emergence and spread of AI viruses with pandemic potential. To assess the risk and protective factors associated with AI infections in poultry within intensive production systems, a systematic literature review was conducted. Databases including Embase, PubMed/Medline, the Health Management Information Consortium, and Global Health were searched for publications from 2003 to 2023, with additional grey literature included. A total of 127 full-text studies were reviewed by two independent researchers, resulting in 27 studies being included. Quality appraisal of the included studies was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, leading to the exclusion of four studies due to low quality. Ultimately, 23 studies were included in the final analysis. Study characteristics, as well as risk and protective factors were extracted, with most factors being related to the introduction of AI into commercial poultry farms. Biosecurity measures emerged as the most significant protective factor against AI. Environmental factors and the production system adopted also influenced a farm's risk of AI infections. Given AI's detrimental effect on ecosystems, economies, international trade, and both human and animal health, enhancing husbandry and biosecurity practices on commercial poultry farms is crucial to safeguard animal welfare, promote sustainable poultry production, and manage the risk of emerging pandemic AI strains.

Keywords: Animal husbandry; Biosecurity; Influenza in birds; Protective factors; Risk factors; Systematic review.

 
Back
Top Bottom