• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One The Need of Health Policy Perspective to Protect Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic. A GRADE Rapid Review on the N95 Respirators Eff

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2020 Jun 3;15(6):e0234025.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234025. eCollection 2020.
The Need of Health Policy Perspective to Protect Healthcare Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic. A GRADE Rapid Review on the N95 Respirators Effectiveness


Primiano Iannone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Greta Castellini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Daniela Coclite[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antonello Napoletano[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alice Josephine Fauci[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Laura Iacorossi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniela D'Angelo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cristina Renzi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Giuseppe La Torre[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Claudio M Mastroianni[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Silvia Gianola[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Protecting Health Care Workers (HCWs) during routine care of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is of paramount importance to halt the SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2) pandemic. The WHO, ECDC and CDC have issued conflicting guidelines on the use of respiratory filters (N95) by HCWs. We searched PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library from the inception to March 21, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing N95 respirators versus surgical masks for prevention of COVID-19 or any other respiratory infection among HCWs. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. Four RCTs involving 8736 HCWs were included. We did not find any trial specifically on prevention of COVID-19. However, wearing N95 respirators can prevent 73 more (95% CI 46-91) clinical respiratory infections per 1000 HCWs compared to surgical masks (2 RCTs; 2594 patients; low quality of evidence). A protective effect of N95 respirators in laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.41; 95%CI 0.28-0.61) was also found. A trend in favour of N95 respirators was observed in preventing laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed respiratory infection, and influenza like illness. We found no direct high quality evidence on whether N95 respirators are better than surgical masks for HCWs protection from SARS-CoV-2. However, low quality evidence suggests that N95 respirators protect HCWs from clinical respiratory infections. This finding should be contemplated to decide the best strategy to support the resilience of healthcare systems facing the potentially catastrophic SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
 
Back
Top Bottom