• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . The greatest air quality experiment ever: Policy suggestions from the COVID-19 lockdown in twelve European cities

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0277428.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277428. eCollection 2022.
The greatest air quality experiment ever: Policy suggestions from the COVID-19 lockdown in twelve European cities


Marialuisa Volta[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Umberto Giostra[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giorgio Guariso[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jose Baldasano[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Martin Lutz[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andreas Kerschbaumer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Annette Rauterberg-Wulff[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Francisco Ferreira[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Luìsa Mendes[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Joana Monjardino[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Nicolas Moussiopοulos[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Christos Vlachokostas[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Peter Viaene[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Janssen Stijn[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Enrico Turrini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elena De Angelis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudio Carnevale[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Martin L Williams[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Michela Maione[SUP] 2 10 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) hit Europe in January 2020. By March, Europe was the active centre of the pandemic. As a result, widespread "lockdown" measures were enforced across the various European countries, even if to a different extent. Such actions caused a dramatic reduction, especially in road traffic. This event can be considered the most significant experiment ever conducted in Europe to assess the impact of a massive switch-off of atmospheric pollutant sources. In this study, we focus on in situ concentration data of the main atmospheric pollutants measured in twelve European cities, characterized by different climatology, emission sources, and strengths. We propose a methodology for the fair comparison of the impact of lockdown measures considering the non-stationarity of meteorological conditions and emissions, which are progressively declining due to the adoption of stricter air quality measures. The analysis of these unmatched circumstances allowed us to estimate the impact of a nearly zero-emission urban transport scenario on air quality in 12 European cities. The clearest result, common to all the cities, is that a dramatic traffic reduction effectively reduces NO2 concentrations. In contrast, each city's PM and ozone concentrations can respond differently to the same type of emission reduction measure. From the policy point of view, these findings suggest that measures targeting urban traffic alone may not be the only effective option for improving air quality in cities.
 
Back
Top Bottom