• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Life lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A model-based cohort analysis of mortality displacement in the registered population of England

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2026 May 8;21(5):e0348575.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0348575. eCollection 2026.
Life lost due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A model-based cohort analysis of mortality displacement in the registered population of England

Andrew Hughes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sharmani Barnard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Clarissa Bauer-Staeb[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard Holleyman[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Samantha Dunn[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paul Fryers[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John N Newton[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Justine Fitzpatrick[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paul Burton[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Peter Goldblatt[SUP] 6 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Uncertainty about the prior health status of those dying during the pandemic has fuelled debate about its impact. To date, attempts to quantify life years lost during the pandemic have relied on using life tables without taking into account varying levels of vulnerability among those that died.
Methods: Using retrospective, linked data from March 2020 to September 2022 for the cohort of all individuals in England alive at outset, we quantified the risk of death, associated with a wide variety of comorbidities, using primary care and hospital data, as well as evidence of vaccination and COVID-19 infection. We then simulated the survival of every individual in the population with a positive COVID-19 test, with and without the assumption that COVID-19 affected their survival, taking account of their personal vulnerability. We used the difference between these simulated survival times to estimate mortality displacement (how long those who died would have lived, had they not tested positive). We used the displacement estimates for those aged 65 and older to revise estimates of excess deaths.
Results: We estimated median mortality displacement of 4.8 (IQR = 1.5 to 16) years for females and 4.4 (IQR = 1.4 to 12.6) years for males at ages 65 and over. We estimate 28% of those dying with COVID-19 aged 65 and over would have survived five years or more without the infection (66% for females aged 65-74).
Conclusions: Life expectancy of those who died with COVID-19 was substantial and, based on our analysis of vulnerability, most of those who died at ages 65 and over are unlikely to have been close to death. In future pandemics, real-time modelling of displacement would be helpful in assessing the mortality impact of the pandemic.


 
Back
Top Bottom