• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

PLoS One . Diagnostic accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in UK primary care (RAPTOR-C19)

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
PLoS One


. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0329611.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329611. eCollection 2025. Diagnostic accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in UK primary care (RAPTOR-C19)

Thomas R Fanshawe[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sharon Tonner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip J Turner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Margaret Głogowska[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Umasha Ukwatte[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cecilia Okusi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jade Cogdale[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maria Zambon[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Brian D Nicholson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], F D Richard Hobbs[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gail N Hayward[SUP] 1 [/SUP]; RAPTOR-C19 Study Group



Affiliations
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Roche SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Rapid Antigen Test at the point of care.
Design: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.
Setting: 17 primary care practices in England.
Participants: 500 individuals with symptoms consistent with possible SARS-CoV-2 or influenza infection identified upon presentation to primary care or via medical note review.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, compared to a laboratory reference standard of real-time reverse transcription PCR, using samples collected using a combined nasal and oropharyngeal swab.
Results: Of 481 participants with available index and reference test results, 5.6% (27/481) were reference standard-positive for SARS-CoV-2, 11.4% (55/481) for Influenza A and 1.9% (9/481) for Influenza B. The sensitivity of the antigen test to detect SARS-CoV-2 was 70.4% (19/27, 95% CI 49.6-86.2%) and specificity was 99.3% (451/454, 95%CI 98.1-99.9%). For Influenza A, sensitivity was 29.1% (16/55, 95% CI 17.6-42.9%) and specificity 98.6% (420/426, 97.0-99.5%), and for Influenza B, sensitivity was 22.2% (2/9, 2.8-60.0%) and specificity 98.1% (463/472, 96.4-99.1%).
Conclusions: In a primary care population of symptomatic individuals, the assay was highly specific and had moderate sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2, but did not detect the majority of influenza infections.
Registration: ISRCTN14226970.


 
Back
Top Bottom