• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Pediatr Nephrol . Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with nephrotic syndrome receiving immunosuppressive agents

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Pediatr Nephrol


. 2022 Aug 1.
doi: 10.1007/s00467-022-05633-y. Online ahead of print.
Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in patients with nephrotic syndrome receiving immunosuppressive agents


Koichi Kamei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Masao Ogura[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mai Sato[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kentaro Nishi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kensuke Shoji[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Takanori Funaki[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Chikara Ogimi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Shuichi Ito[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: As there are no large-scale reports of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination in patients with nephrotic syndrome using immunosuppressive agents, we conducted the prospective study.
Methods: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were administered to patients with nephrotic syndrome receiving immunosuppressive agents. The titers of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain antibodies were measured before and after vaccination. We evaluated factors associated with antibody titers after vaccination and analyzed adverse events.
Results: We enrolled 40 patients and evaluated vaccine immunogenicity in 35 of them. Seroconversion (> 0.8 U/mL) was achieved in all patients, and the median antibody titer was 598 U/mL (interquartile range, 89-1380 U/mL). Patients using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) showed lower antibody titers than those who were not (median: 272 U/mL vs. 2660 U/mL, p = 0.0002), and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels showed a weak linear relationship with antibody titers (R[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.16). No breakthrough infections were noted. Three patients (7.5%) suffered from a relapse of nephrotic syndrome (2 and 3 days, respectively, after the first dose and 8 days after the second dose), two of whom had a history of relapse within 6 months before the vaccination.
Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine was immunogenic in patients with nephrotic syndrome using immunosuppressive agents, although the use of MMF and low levels of serum IgG were associated with lower antibody titers after vaccination. Patients with high disease activity may experience a relapse of nephrotic syndrome after vaccination. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Keywords: Mycophenolate mofetil; Nephrotic syndrome; Relapse; SARS-CoV-2 S antibody; Seroconversion; Serum IgG.
 
Back
Top Bottom