• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Open Forum Infect Dis . Five-Day vs 10-Day Postexposure Chemoprophylaxis With Oseltamivir to Prevent Hospital Transmission of Influenza: A Noninfer

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Open Forum Infect Dis


. 2020 Jun 19;7(8):ofaa240.
doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa240. eCollection 2020 Aug.
Five-Day vs 10-Day Postexposure Chemoprophylaxis With Oseltamivir to Prevent Hospital Transmission of Influenza: A Noninferiority Randomized Open-Label Study


Lidija Lepen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rok Blagus[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Maša Velušček[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rajko Saletinger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Miroslav Petrovec[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Fajko F Bajrović[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Daša Stupica[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and optimal duration of postexposure influenza prophylaxis with oseltamivir are undetermined in hospital settings, where immediate separation from index cases is not feasible.
Methods: In an open-label noninferiority randomized clinical trial in a single-center university hospital, the efficacy of 5-day vs 10-day postexposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir was compared in adult patients exposed to influenza who could not be immediately separated from index influenza cases. Influenza incidence was assessed for 10 days after discontinuing prophylaxis.
Results: Among 222 exposed patients (median age, 75 years; male 119; median Charlson Comorbidity Index, 5), 110 patients were assigned to 5 days of postexposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir, and 112 patients were assigned to the 10-day group. The median duration of exposure to influenza (interquartile range) was 2 (1-3) days. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of influenza was 2/110 (1.8%) in the 5-day group and 0/112 (0%) in the 10-day group (difference, 1.8 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -1 to 4.9 percentage points; P = .77).
Conclusions: For patients exposed to influenza in a hospital setting and who were not immediately separated from index cases, postexposure prophylaxis with oseltamivir resulted in low incidence of nosocomial influenza transmission. Five-day postexposure prophylaxis was noninferior to 10-day regimen.
Clinicaltrialsgov registration: NCT03899571.

Keywords: chemoprophylaxis; infection control; influenza; neuraminidase inhibitor.
 
Back
Top Bottom