• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

One Health . Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metro

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
One Health


. 2020 Dec;10:100160.
doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100160. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
Impact of mitigating interventions and temperature on the instantaneous reproduction number in the COVID-19 pandemic among 30 US metropolitan areas


Xinhua Yu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: After more than six months into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, as of August 10, 2020, over 734,664 people had died worldwide. The current study aims to evaluate how mitigating interventions affected the epidemic process in the 30 largest metropolitan areas in the US and whether temperature played a role in the epidemic process.
Methods: Publicly available data for the time series of COVID-19 cases and deaths and weather were analyzed at the metropolitan level. The time-varying reproductive numbers (R[SUB]t[/SUB]) based on retrospective moving average were used to explore the trends. Student t-tests were used to compare temperature and peak R[SUB]t[/SUB] cross-sectionally.
Results: We found that virus transmissibility, measured by instantaneous reproduction number (R[SUB]t[/SUB]), had declined since the end of March for all areas and almost all of them reached a R[SUB]t[/SUB] of 1 or below after April 15, 2020. The timing of the main decline was concurrent with the implementation of mitigating interventions. However, the R[SUB]t[/SUB]s remained around 1 for most areas since then and there were some small and short rebounds in some areas, suggesting a persistent epidemic in those areas when interventions were relaxed. Cities with warm temperature also tended to have a lower peak R[SUB]t[/SUB] than that of cities with cold temperature. However, they were not statistically significant and large geographic variations existed.
Conclusions: Aggressive interventions might have mitigated the current pandemic of COVID-19, while temperature might have weak effects on the virus transmission. We may need to prepare for a possible return of the coronavirus outbreak.

Keywords: COVID-19 epidemic; Mitigating intervention; Reproduction number; Temperature; Virus transmissibility.
 
Back
Top Bottom