Re: Nonpharmaceutical Influenza Mitigation Strategies, US Communities, 1918?1920 Pand
Re: Nonpharmaceutical Influenza Mitigation Strategies, US Communities, 1918?1920 Pand
Two months ago, Mike Osterholm said publicly in Ventura County, California that he and his wife had agreed to Protective Sequestration for her and his younger children for the duration of the Pandemic.
He said he would not return home during the pandemic. His "home" is being built in the MN countryside, next to a running creek. His interpretation of this Pandemic will be that it will be virulent enough (my words, "vicious enough") to place his own life at risk and avoid the loss of his family.
Stop just for a moment... and think about this man is assuming, and what he really believes about the probability of attenuation of the virulence of this virus.
Mike is saying, there's LITTLE TO NO CHANCE [emphais and words mine] this virus will decline in virulence, that it WILL kill young people [his kids], and that all that 21st century American society can do is prepare to hide out, totally independent of each other... which sounds a lot like total collapse of the distribution chain for a period of months.
Hello Out There!
His "news" was assumedly based on this "news".
If Mike, head of CIDRAP, concludes that the only safe protection is to hide out, I believe we should heed his shared plan and try as best we can to plan to isolate ourselves as best we can.