• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

New tests for an old foe: an update on influenza screening

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
IDrugs. 2010 Apr;13(4):248-53.
New tests for an old foe: an update on influenza screening.

Wittman V, Byers A, Drake D, Kachurina O, Tapia T, Warren W, Kachurin A.

VaxDesign Corp, Suite 365, Orlando, FL 32826, USA. vwittman@vaxdesign.com
Abstract

The standard in vitro assays used for the generation and characterization of antibodies that bind and neutralize the influenza virus have not been modified significantly in many years. The use of cultured human cells has been instrumental in understanding the basis of the immune response, and the in vitro generation of influenza-specific antibodies may be used to provide novel insights into the selection of potential vaccines. Furthermore, the essential functional assays that evaluate the antibody response have several features that could be improved, including increased sensitivity, the ability to use an inactivated virus, the automation and mechanization of analytic readouts, and inter-laboratory consistency. This feature review discusses a series of assays that have been developed to address these issues and improve the ability to evaluate the anti-influenza antibody response.

PMID: 20373254 [PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20373254?dopt=Abstract
 
Back
Top Bottom