• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

New compound raises hope in fight against deadly flu strains

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.vancouversun.com/Health/...ght+against+deadly+strains/1595021/story.html

New compound raises hope in fight against deadly flu strains
By Amy O'Brian, Vancouver SunMay 14, 2009

Long before the swine flu emerged as a public health threat, a B.C.-based scientist was working toward an antiviral weapon to combat both swine and avian flu.

Steven Jones, associate director of the Genome Sciences Centre and a professor at both Simon Fraser University and the University of B.C., began working two years ago with a team of researchers to identify molecular compounds that could destroy the deadly strains of influenza.

After examining hundreds of thousands of molecular compounds, Jones and two teams of researchers here and in Hong Kong identified a single molecular compound that could, eventually, be developed into an antiviral drug that would serve as an alternative to Tamiflu and Relenza. Tamiflu has been effective in treating the flu viruses, but resistance to the drug is developing.

"Essentially, we need more arrows in our quiver," Jones said Tuesday in a phone interview.

"We need to learn more about the things that will stop these viruses from replicating."

Using 200 computers that worked non-stop for a week processing hundreds of thousands pieces of data, Jones and his team at the B.C. Cancer Agency's Genome Sciences Centre came up with 20 molecular compounds that could theoretically interfere with the protein structures of the influenza virus.

Those compounds were sent to a team of researchers at the University of Hong Kong's Cytokine Biology Group, where further testing showed only one of the 20 was potentially effective.

"One of them worked. One of them did actually stop the replication of the virus," Jones said.

The discovery needs far more development before it becomes an applicable antiviral drug, including testing on animals and humans.

"There are lots of hurdles that this molecule would have to pass before becoming a drug," Jones said.

"It would be a long process . . . in the realm of five years or more. It's not going to be a drug tomorrow."

But Jones noted that scientists in B.C. and around the world are working constantly to find weapons against influenza viruses.

"The bottom line is that there is activity and these things are happening," he said.

"We need to be working on these things all the time, not just when there is an outbreak."

aobrian@vancouversun.com
 
Re: New compound raises hope in fight against deadly flu strains

A note to 'newcomers'.

The above story is a pretty good example of what is called 'Science by Press Release'. Traditionally, scientific research has been published in scientific journals and subjected to peer review. This allows other researchers to try and duplicate the results of the original research and confirm/refute the findings, or to offer critiques of the research. Both of these responses insures that science remains science and not pseudo-science.

The above story may be completely true. These researchers may have come up with an alternative to current anti-virals. But, there is no reference to the researchers publishing in a respected journal for peer review. It's good to develope a healthy skepticism about such announcements.
 
Back
Top