• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Neurol Sci . The association between stroke and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on adjusted effect estimate

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Neurol Sci


. 2022 Mar 24.
doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06024-9. Online ahead of print.
The association between stroke and COVID-19-related mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on adjusted effect estimates


Shuwen Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiahao Ren[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hongjie Hou[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xueya Han[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jie Xu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Guangcai Duan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yadong Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Haiyan Yang[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between stroke and the risk for mortality among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.
Methods: We performed systematic searches through electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify potential articles reporting adjusted effect estimates on the association of stroke with COVID-19-related mortality. To estimate pooled effects, the random-effects model was applied. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity. The stability of the results was assessed by sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was evaluated by Begg's test and Egger's test.
Results: This meta-analysis included 47 studies involving 7,267,055 patients. The stroke was associated with higher COVID-19 mortality (pooled effect = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.44; I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 89%, P < 0.01; random-effects model). Subgroup analyses yielded consistent results among area, age, proportion of males, setting, cases, effect type, and proportion of severe COVID-19 cases. Statistical heterogeneity might result from the different effect type according to the meta-regression (P = 0.0105). Sensitivity analysis suggested that our results were stable and robust. Both Begg's test and Egger's test indicated that potential publication bias did not exist.
Conclusion: Stroke was independently associated with a significantly increased risk for mortality in COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: Adjusted effect estimates; COVID-19; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Stroke.
 
Back
Top Bottom