• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Med . Impact of vaccination on new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United Kingdom

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Med


. 2021 Jun 9.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01410-w. Online ahead of print.
Impact of vaccination on new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United Kingdom


Emma Pritchard[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Philippa C Matthews[SUP] 1 3 4 [/SUP], Nicole Stoesser[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], David W Eyre[SUP] 2 3 4 5 [/SUP], Owen Gethings[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Karina-Doris Vihta[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Joel Jones[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Thomas House[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Harper VanSteenHouse[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Iain Bell[SUP] 6 [/SUP], John I Bell[SUP] 11 [/SUP], John N Newton[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Jeremy Farrar[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Ian Diamond[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Emma Rourke[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ruth Studley[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Derrick Crook[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Tim E A Peto[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], A Sarah Walker[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 3 14 [/SUP], Koen B Pouwels[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 15 16 17 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in the general community is still unclear. Here, we used the Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey-a large community-based survey of individuals living in randomly selected private households across the United Kingdom-to assess the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca; ChAdOx1) vaccines against any new SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive tests, split according to self-reported symptoms, cycle threshold value (<30 versus ≥30; as a surrogate for viral load) and gene positivity pattern (compatible with B.1.1.7 or not). Using 1,945,071 real-time PCR results from nose and throat swabs taken from 383,812 participants between 1 December 2020 and 8 May 2021, we found that vaccination with the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines already reduced SARS-CoV-2 infections ≥21 d after the first dose (61% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 54-68%) versus 66% (95% CI = 60-71%), respectively), with greater reductions observed after a second dose (79% (95% CI = 65-88%) versus 80% (95% CI = 73-85%), respectively). The largest reductions were observed for symptomatic infections and/or infections with a higher viral burden. Overall, COVID-19 vaccination reduced the number of new SARS-CoV-2 infections, with the largest benefit received after two vaccinations and against symptomatic and high viral burden infections, and with no evidence of a difference between the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 vaccines.
 
Back
Top Bottom