• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Med . Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Med


. 2021 Jul 14.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01449-9. Online ahead of print.
Immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous and homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/BNT162b2 vaccination


Joana Barros-Martins[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Swantje I Hammerschmidt[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anne Cossmann[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ivan Odak[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Metodi V Stankov[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Gema Morillas Ramos[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alexandra Dopfer-Jablonka[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Annika Heidemann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christiane Ritter[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michaela Friedrichsen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christian Schultze-Florey[SUP] 1 4 [/SUP], Inga Ravens[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stefanie Willenzon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anja Bubke[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jasmin Ristenpart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anika Janssen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], George Ssebyatika[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Günter Bernhardt[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jan Münch[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Markus Hoffmann[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Stefan Pöhlmann[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Thomas Krey[SUP] 5 9 [/SUP], Berislav Bošnjak[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Reinhold Förster[SUP] 11 12 13 [/SUP], Georg M N Behrens[SUP] 14 15 16 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Currently approved viral vector-based and mRNA-based vaccine approaches against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) consider only homologous prime-boost vaccination. After reports of thromboembolic events, several European governments recommended using AstraZeneca's ChAdOx1-nCov-19 (ChAd) only in individuals older than 60 years, leaving millions of already ChAd-primed individuals with the decision to receive either a second shot of ChAd or a heterologous boost with mRNA-based vaccines. However, such combinations have not been tested so far. We used Hannover Medical School's COVID-19 Contact Study cohort of healthcare professionals to monitor ChAd-primed immune responses before and 3 weeks after booster with ChAd (n = 32) or BioNTech/Pfizer's BNT162b2 (n = 55). Although both vaccines boosted prime-induced immunity, BNT162b2 induced significantly higher frequencies of spike-specific CD4[SUP]+[/SUP] and CD8[SUP]+[/SUP] T cells and, in particular, high titers of neutralizing antibodies against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 and P.1 variants of concern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
 
Back
Top Bottom