• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Med . Antibody responses and correlates of protection in the general population after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Med


. 2022 Feb 14.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01721-6. Online ahead of print.
Antibody responses and correlates of protection in the general population after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines


Jia Wei[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Koen B Pouwels[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Nicole Stoesser[SUP] 1 3 5 6 [/SUP], Philippa C Matthews[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Ian Diamond[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ruth Studley[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Emma Rourke[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Duncan Cook[SUP] 7 [/SUP], John I Bell[SUP] 8 [/SUP], John N Newton[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Jeremy Farrar[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Alison Howarth[SUP] 1 6 [/SUP], Brian D Marsden[SUP] 1 11 [/SUP], Sarah Hoosdally[SUP] 1 [/SUP], E Yvonne Jones[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David I Stuart[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Derrick W Crook[SUP] 1 3 5 6 [/SUP], Tim E A Peto[SUP] 1 3 5 6 [/SUP], A Sarah Walker[SUP] 1 2 3 12 [/SUP], David W Eyre[SUP] 13 14 15 16 [/SUP], COVID-19 Infection Survey team



Collaborators, Affiliations

Abstract

Antibody responses are an important part of immunity after Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. However, antibody trajectories and the associated duration of protection after a second vaccine dose remain unclear. In this study, we investigated anti-spike IgG antibody responses and correlates of protection after second doses of ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the United Kingdom general population. In 222,493 individuals, we found significant boosting of anti-spike IgG by the second doses of both vaccines in all ages and using different dosing intervals, including the 3-week interval for BNT162b2. After second vaccination, BNT162b2 generated higher peak levels than ChAdOX1. Older individuals and males had lower peak levels with BNT162b2 but not ChAdOx1, whereas declines were similar across ages and sexes with ChAdOX1 or BNT162b2. Prior infection significantly increased antibody peak level and half-life with both vaccines. Anti-spike IgG levels were associated with protection from infection after vaccination and, to an even greater degree, after prior infection. At least 67% protection against infection was estimated to last for 2-3 months after two ChAdOx1 doses, for 5-8 months after two BNT162b2 doses in those without prior infection and for 1-2 years for those unvaccinated after natural infection. A third booster dose might be needed, prioritized to ChAdOx1 recipients and those more clinically vulnerable.
 
Back
Top Bottom