• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Nat Commun . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of vaccination on prevention of long COVID

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Nat Commun


. 2025 Nov 24;16(1):10326.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65302-0. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of vaccination on prevention of long COVID

Rhiannon Green[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zoe Marjenberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gregory Y H Lip[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Amitava Banerjee[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Juan Wisnivesky[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Brendan C Delaney[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Michael J Peluso[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Elke Wynberg[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Sultan Abduljawad[SUP] 10 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Long COVID affects millions worldwide and its prevention is a critical public health strategy. While prior analyses show primary vaccination prevents long COVID in subsequent infections, the effect of booster vaccination on long COVID after Omicron infections is unclear. This systematic review identifies 31 observational studies, of which 11 are suitable for pairwise meta-analyses. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of long COVID in those vaccinated (any dose) versus unvaccinated is 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.85; p < 0.0001; 10 studies). ORs were also lower for primary course vaccination versus unvaccinated (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.79-0.83; p < 0.0001; 3 studies), booster vaccination versus unvaccinated (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.86; p = 0.0001; 4 studies), and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination (OR 77; 95% CI 0.65-0.92; p = 0.0044; 3 studies). These findings indicate that booster vaccination can provide additional protection against long COVID, highlighting the importance of seasonal vaccination against new SARS-CoV-2 variants. They should, however, be interpreted cautiously, given the small number of studies and the low quality of evidence.


 
Back
Top Bottom