• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

N Engl J Med . Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
N Engl J Med


. 2021 Mar 16.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102214. Online ahead of print.
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant


Shabir A Madhi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vicky Baillie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Clare L Cutland[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Merryn Voysey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anthonet L Koen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lee Fairlie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sherman D Padayachee[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Keertan Dheda[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shaun L Barnabas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Qasim E Bhorat[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carmen Briner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gaurav Kwatra[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Khatija Ahmed[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Parvinder Aley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sutika Bhikha[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jinal N Bhiman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], As'ad E Bhorat[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jeanine du Plessis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aliasgar Esmail[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marisa Groenewald[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elizea Horne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shi-Hsia Hwa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aylin Jose[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Teresa Lambe[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matt Laubscher[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mookho Malahleha[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Masebole Masenya[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mduduzi Masilela[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Shakeel McKenzie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kgaogelo Molapo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew Moultrie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Suzette Oelofse[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Faeezah Patel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sureshnee Pillay[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sarah Rhead[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hylton Rodel[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lindie Rossouw[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carol Taoushanis[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Houriiyah Tegally[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Asha Thombrayil[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samuel van Eck[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Constantinos K Wibmer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicholas M Durham[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elizabeth J Kelly[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tonya L Villafana[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sarah Gilbert[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew J Pollard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tulio de Oliveira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Penny L Moore[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alex Sigal[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alane Izu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], NGS-SA Group Wits?VIDA COVID Group



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5?10[SUP]10[/SUP] viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose.
Results: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (92.9%) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups.
Conclusions: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).
 
Back
Top Bottom