• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Mutation in MERS virus

Li's previous research, published in Science in 2005, showed two mutations were critical for SARS to transmit from its animal reservoir in palm civets to humans. Different from the two mutations identified in MERS, the two mutations identified in SARS allowed the virus to attach to the human receptor with much enhanced affinity. Therefore, MERS and SARS have used two different evolutionary strategies to achieve efficient infections of human cells.

Li's previous research was disproved, (unfortunately after many pet cats and dogs were needlessly killed.)

The analysis tracing the viruses? paths through human and animal hosts counters assertions that SARS was eradicated in 2004 when thousands of palm civet cats in China were identified as the original source and killed in an effort to eliminate the risk of new outbreaks. [TABLE="align: right, border: 0, cellpadding: 4, cellspacing: 4"]
[TR]
[TD="width: 23, align: left"] [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: left"]
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][SIZE=-1] [/SIZE][/FONT]​
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
According to this new analysis, humans actually appear to be the source of the virus found in those civets, a wild game animal considered a delicacy in southern China.
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/SARStree.htm

So the movement of both MERS and SARS into humans could be more alike than different. That's why I'm skeptical of the MERS focus on camels.

More striking still is that one of them, dubbed SL-CoV-WIV1, is able to use the human angiotensin converting enzyme II (ACE2) to enter cells -- the same molecule used by the SARS coronavirus. The findings suggest that "SARS-like coronaviruses are diverse and abundant in bats in Asia, and the potential for future spillover remains high," Daszak said in a statement. The current outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is caused by a coronavirus thought to have originated in bats, but investigators haven't pinned down a pathway from the animals to humans. The current findings, Daszak and colleagues argued, suggests that an intermediate host may not be necessary.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/LabNotes/LabNotes/42676

Sometimes the existence of a novel pathogen in a species associated with humans is the result of a 'reverse zoonosis.'
 
Back
Top