Re: Molecular & antigenic evolution & geographical spread of HPAI H5N1 in W. Africa
Sublineages of HPAI H5N1 in Africa on the basis of full genome sequencing
Detailed phylogenetic analysis of each of the eight gene segments<SUP> </SUP>and the full-length genome revealed three African sublineages<SUP> </SUP>with a distinct nucleotide and amino acid signature. Although<SUP> </SUP>two of the three sublineages, B and C, emerged from a common<SUP> </SUP>node, their high Kimura distance and their distinct geographical<SUP> </SUP>distribution within Africa suggest three rather than two distinct<SUP> </SUP>sublineages. Sublineage A seems to have emerged from Astrakhan<SUP> </SUP>2005 and was originally found in the BA farm in south-western<SUP> </SUP>Nigeria from where it spread more recently to several other<SUP> </SUP>farms in the same part of the country and to Niger. This sublineage<SUP> </SUP>might be even more closely related to swans from Poland and<SUP> </SUP>Germany and a buzzard from Denmark (0.3 % diversity in the HA<SUP> </SUP>gene; Dr Ian Brown, personal communication). In Africa, sublineage<SUP> </SUP>B was found in a single farm in the south-west of Nigeria and<SUP> </SUP>is the only sublineage reported from Egypt and Djibouti. Its<SUP> </SUP>ancestor is less clear, as the different genes have mixed characteristics<SUP> </SUP>from European, Russian and Mongolian strains. Interestingly,<SUP> </SUP>all reported human cases in Africa (Egypt and Djibouti) have<SUP> </SUP>been caused by viruses of this sublineage. The African sublineage<SUP> </SUP>C was found in northern Nigeria (A/chicken/Nigeria/641/2006)<SUP> </SUP>and all strains reported from the Sudan and C?te d'Ivoire<SUP> </SUP>belong to this sublineage. It is closely related to A/chicken/Kurgan/3/2005,<SUP> </SUP>but we cannot exclude a similar or higher homology with unpublished<SUP> </SUP>sequences from strains circulating elsewhere. Sublineages B<SUP> </SUP>and C seem to have emerged from a more recent common ancestor<SUP> </SUP>than the Qinghai Lake 2005 strains and it cannot be excluded<SUP> </SUP>that this common ancestor was circulating in Africa.<SUP> </SUP>
In the new strains reported here, no evidence of reassortment<SUP> </SUP>was found, in contrast to A/chicken/Nigeria/1047-62/2006 where<SUP> </SUP>HA, NP, NS and PB1 gene segments clustered with sublineage C<SUP> </SUP>strains and NA, M, PA and PB2 clustered with sublineage A strains<SUP> </SUP>(Salzberg
et al., 2007

). Human cases reported so far in Africa<SUP> </SUP>(Egypt and Djibouti) have all been caused by sublineage B, but<SUP> </SUP>it would be dangerous to infer a lower infection potential of<SUP> </SUP>sublineages A and C strains for humans.<SUP> </SUP>
Substitution rates
HPAI H5N1 substitution rates in Africa were high, reaching on<SUP> </SUP>average 2.6[FONT=arial,helvetica]x[/FONT]10<SUP>?3</SUP> substitutions per site per year. This<SUP> </SUP>is well within the range of substitution rates of avian influenza<SUP> </SUP>viruses in general and H5N1 in particular, as described by Chen<SUP> </SUP>& Holmes (2006)

using the same calculation method. During<SUP> </SUP>the 1994 H5N2 outbreak in Mexico, higher substitution rates<SUP> </SUP>(0.88[FONT=arial,helvetica]x[/FONT]10<SUP>?2</SUP> to 2.8[FONT=arial,helvetica]x[/FONT]10<SUP>?2</SUP> substitutions per site per<SUP> </SUP>year) were reported (Garcia
et al., 1997

) but flocks were partially<SUP> </SUP>vaccinated.<SUP> </SUP>
To date, estimates of mutation rates from a single farm are<SUP> </SUP>rare. Under the assumption of a single introductory event into<SUP> </SUP>the SO farm, a direct ancestral relationship between strains<SUP> </SUP>isolated subsequently in the farm and a 5 week evolution<SUP> </SUP>in the farm (15 January to 20 March 2006), the substitution<SUP> </SUP>rate of the virus for each gene segment including 11 HA sequences<SUP> </SUP>was calculated. The rate of 4.58[FONT=arial,helvetica]x[/FONT]10<SUP>?2</SUP> substitutions per<SUP> </SUP>site per year (for HA, Table 1

) was higher than the substitution<SUP> </SUP>rate calculated within Africa using the same calculation method<SUP> </SUP>(1.60[FONT=arial,helvetica]x[/FONT]10<SUP>?2</SUP> substitutions per site per year; Table 1

).<SUP> </SUP>This suggests that HPAI H5N1 mutated faster within a farm with<SUP> </SUP>a virtually unlimited supply and high density of susceptible<SUP> </SUP>(unvaccinated) animals than on its way from Qinghai to Africa.<SUP> </SUP>
Based on the HA substitution rate in the SO farm (sublineage<SUP> </SUP>B), it would have taken a minimum of 18 weeks for the south-west<SUP> </SUP>Nigerian strains (sublineages A and B) to evolve from a common<SUP> </SUP>ancestor and 13?14 weeks for each of the south-western<SUP> </SUP>strains to develop from the northern strain (A/chicken/Nigeria/641/2006,<SUP> </SUP>sublineage C). As the three outbreaks occurred within a maximum<SUP> </SUP>of 8 weeks, the strains probably did not spread from one<SUP> </SUP>farm to another. In particular, as H5N1 emerged essentially<SUP> </SUP>at the same time in the north (10 January 2006) and in the SO<SUP> </SUP>farm (15 January 2006), these two sublineages probably did not<SUP> </SUP>develop within Nigeria. Thus, these data and the fact that the<SUP> </SUP>closest pre-Nigerian relatives of each of the sublineages were<SUP> </SUP>geographically separated further support the independent introduction<SUP> </SUP>of each of the three H5N1 sublineages in Nigeria as suggested<SUP> </SUP>previously (Ducatez
et al., 2006a

), even if the B and C sublineages<SUP> </SUP>emerged from a common ancestor. The same analysis for the sublineage<SUP> </SUP>A strains from the south-west revealed that the 5 months<SUP> </SUP>between the outbreaks was in agreement with the genetic distances<SUP> </SUP>between strains, as calculated with Kimura parameters. The HA<SUP> </SUP>substitution rate in the SO farm was also compatible with a<SUP> </SUP>single introduction of a sublineage C strain into Burkina Faso.<SUP> </SUP>Unexpectedly, but as already observed by Chen & Holmes (2006)

,<SUP> </SUP>the change of host (chicken to hooded vulture) did not seem<SUP> </SUP>to influence the mutation rate of the virus.<SUP> </SUP>
Nucleotide and amino acid substitutions and biological consequences
As previously discussed for Burkina Faso strains (Ducatez
et<SUP> </SUP>al., 2007

), west African H5N1 strains retained the amino acid<SUP> </SUP>pattern associated with preferential binding to
2,3-linked sialic<SUP> </SUP>acid (mostly present in avian species): <SUP>91</SUP>Y, <SUP>130</SUP>GVSS<SUP>134</SUP>, <SUP>149</SUP>W,<SUP> </SUP><SUP>151</SUP>I, <SUP>179</SUP>H, <SUP>186</SUP>E, <SUP>190</SUP>LY<SUP>191</SUP> and <SUP>220</SUP>NGQSGR<SUP>225</SUP> (Ha
et al., 2001

;<SUP> </SUP>Shinya
et al., 2004

). Mutations towards increased binding to<SUP> </SUP>human receptors (to
2,6-linked sialic acid) did not seem to<SUP> </SUP>have occurred in west African H5N1 strains. In contrast to south-east<SUP> </SUP>Asian lineages, PB2 segments of west African strains have a<SUP> </SUP>lysine instead of a glutamic acid in position 627, lysine corresponding<SUP> </SUP>to a more pathogenic H5N1 phenotype with accelerated viral replication,<SUP> </SUP>a reduced host defence and higher mortality in mice (Fouchier<SUP> </SUP>
et al., 2004

; Hatta
et al., 2001

), as well as increased virulence<SUP> </SUP>of H7N7 in human (Chen
et al., 2006a

). Chen
et al. (2006a)

studied<SUP> </SUP>H5N1 viruses in waterfowl in western China in 2005 and observed<SUP> </SUP>lysine residues in position 627 for most but not all of the<SUP> </SUP>virus isolates. Among the non-south-east Asian strains, some<SUP> </SUP>Russian strains, including A/
Cygnus olor/Astrakhan/Ast05-2-4/2005,<SUP> </SUP>A/duck/Kurgan/08/2005 and A/chicken/Tula/Russia/Oct-5/2005,<SUP> </SUP>had a glutamic acid at PB2 position 627, thus also co-existing<SUP> </SUP>with the lysine as found in western China. Strains from Russia<SUP> </SUP>and western China seem to represent intermediates between the<SUP> </SUP>south-east Asian strains with only glutamic acid and the African<SUP> </SUP>strains with only lysine.<SUP> </SUP>
None of the west African H5N1 strains showed a signatory amino<SUP> </SUP>acid pattern associated with resistance to oseltamivir or to<SUP> </SUP>amantadine. <SUP>274</SUP>H was indeed present in all Nigerian and Burkina<SUP> </SUP>Faso NA sequences, whilst <SUP>274</SUP>Y has been observed in oseltamivir-resistant<SUP> </SUP>patients in Vietnam (de Jong
et al., 2005

). Moreover, all west<SUP> </SUP>African strains had a <SUP>27</SUP>V/I, <SUP>30</SUP>A, <SUP>31</SUP>S and <SUP>34</SUP>G pattern in M2<SUP> </SUP>and none of the amantadine-resistance markers (<SUP>27</SUP>V, <SUP>30</SUP>A, <SUP>31</SUP>S<SUP> </SUP>and <SUP>34</SUP>D) (Scholtissek
et al., 1998

).<SUP> </SUP>
Unlike the suggestion by Chen
et al. (2006b)

, <SUP>99</SUP>I and <SUP>268</SUP>N in<SUP> </SUP>HA as well as <SUP>111</SUP>R in NA are not always associated with wild<SUP> </SUP>birds, as shown by new sequences from domestic poultry in Africa,<SUP> </SUP>Europe and Russia. All Nigerian and Burkina Faso H5N1 strains<SUP> </SUP>from chickens had these three amino acids, whilst A/hooded vulture/Burkina<SUP> </SUP>Faso/1/2006 had <SUP>268</SUP>Y instead of the predicted <SUP>268</SUP>N.<SUP> </SUP>
In all of the available NS gene sequences from Africa, Europe<SUP> </SUP>and Russia, a <SUP>563</SUP>G<IMG alt="->" src="http://vir.sgmjournals.org.proxy.library.vcu.edu/math/rarr.gif" border=0>C substitution was observed, which may correspond<SUP> </SUP>to a change in RNA conformation as described by Gultyaev
et<SUP> </SUP>al. (2007)

for the recent H5N1 strains. Thus, the NS gene of<SUP> </SUP>the African HPAI H5N1 2006 viruses would be likely to show a<SUP> </SUP>hairpin rather than a pseudoknot conformation towards the 3'<SUP> </SUP>extremity, which may play a role in mRNA splicing regulation<SUP> </SUP>(Gultyaev
et al., 2007

).<SUP> </SUP>
Selection pressure
In Africa, Europe and Russia, most H5N1 genes are under purifying<SUP> </SUP>selection with 0.10<
<0.43 (Table 1

), suggesting that<SUP> </SUP>a non-synonymous mutation has only 10?43 % as much chance<SUP> </SUP>as a synonymous mutation of being fixed in the population. Only<SUP> </SUP>the PB1-F2 gene seems to be under positive natural selection<SUP> </SUP>(
=8.476, data not shown), but, as discussed by Holmes
et al.<SUP> </SUP>(2006)

, this is probably due to the overlap of the PB1 and PB1-F2<SUP> </SUP>ORFs (a shift of 1 nt compared with PB1 ORF) and therefore represents<SUP> </SUP>an artefact. In south-east Asian 2002?2005 genotype Z<SUP> </SUP>H5N1 strains, M2 was also under positive natural selection,<SUP> </SUP>which was not the case in the 26 African strains analysed here<SUP> </SUP>or in the available strains from western Asia, Russia and Europe<SUP> </SUP>(data not shown). No positively selected codons were detected<SUP> </SUP>here in HA, unlike observations in south-eastern strains (Smith<SUP> </SUP>
et al., 2006

).<SUP> </SUP>
Our data indicate that the geographical origin of west African<SUP> </SUP>HPAI H5N1 was not south-east Asia but the central Asian/European<SUP> </SUP>region. The three sublineages A, B and C already existed prior<SUP> </SUP>to the arrival of HPAI H5N1 in Africa. They have continued to<SUP> </SUP>circulate and to evolve both in Africa and in Europe, e.g. in<SUP> </SUP>Germany. Although the relative roles of bird migration and the<SUP> </SUP>poultry trade in the spread of recent H5N1 remain a matter for<SUP> </SUP>debate, the present study contributes to a better understanding<SUP> </SUP>of the evolution and geographical spread of HPAI H5N1 in Africa.<SUP> </SUP>H5N1 virus has been reported from 14 of the 31 Federal Nigerian<SUP> </SUP>States and has caused at least five outbreaks in poultry and<SUP> </SUP>one outbreak in wild birds in Burkina Faso. It is difficult<SUP> </SUP>to see how the virus can be contained without depopulation combined<SUP> </SUP>with surveillance and large-scale vaccination. Despite the high<SUP> </SUP>mortality caused by H5N1, surveillance is complicated by uncharacteristic<SUP> </SUP>organ lesions at necropsy and multiple viral and bacterial co-infections<SUP> </SUP>(Ducatez
et al., 2006b

; Igbokwe
et al., 1996

; Owoade
et al.,<SUP> </SUP>2006

, 2004a

, b

), many of which are associated with significant<SUP> </SUP>levels of mortality. Reservations of the developed countries<SUP> </SUP>towards vaccination against H5N1 delay crucial decisions and<SUP> </SUP>prevent rapid action in Africa. Socio-economic and political<SUP> </SUP>hurdles further compromise control measures, whilst the virus<SUP> </SUP>continues to spread and threatens to become endemic.<SUP> </SUP>