• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Microorganisms . Eosinopenia in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Microorganisms


. 2020 Dec 4;8(12):E1929.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121929.
Eosinopenia in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis


Narcisse Ndieugnou Djangang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lorenzo Peluso[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marta Talamonti[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antonio Izzi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pierre Alain Gevenois[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Alessandra Garufi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jean-Christophe Goffard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sophie Henrard[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paolo Severgnini[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jean-Louis Vincent[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jacques Creteur[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fabio Silvio Taccone[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic role of eosinophils count in COVID-19 patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to our hospital with suspicion of COVID-19. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected on admission. Eosinopenia was defined as eosinophils < 100 cells/mm[SUP]3[/SUP]. The outcomes of this study were the association between eosinophils count on admission and positive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test and with suggestive chest computerized tomography (CT) of COVID-19 pneumonia. Results: A total of 174 patients was studied. Of those, 54% had positive rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2. A chest CT-scan was performed in 145 patients; 71% showed suggestive findings of COVID-19. Eosinophils on admission had a high predictive accuracy for positive rRT-PCR and suggestive chest CT-scan (area under the receiver operating characteristic-ROC curve, 0.84 (95% CIs 0.78-0.90) and 0.84 (95% CIs 0.77-0.91), respectively). Eosinopenia and high LDH were independent predictors of positive rRT-PCR, whereas eosinopenia, high body mass index and hypertension were predictors for suggestive CT-scan findings. Conclusions: Eosinopenia on admission could predict positive rRT-PCR test or suggestive chest CT-scan for COVID-19. This laboratory finding could help to identify patients at high-risk of COVID-19 in the setting where gold standard diagnostic methods are not available.

Keywords: COVID-19; chest CT imaging; coronavirus; eosinophils; reverse transcription polymerase.
 
Back
Top Bottom