• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

medRxiv [Preprint]. Towards diagnostic preparedness: detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in contrived nasal swab specimens using

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
medRxiv


[Preprint]. 2025 Apr 16:2025.04.15.25325613.
doi: 10.1101/2025.04.15.25325613.
Towards diagnostic preparedness: detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in contrived nasal swab specimens using rapid antigen and point-of-care molecular tests

Leda Bassit, Gregory L Damhorst, Heather B Bowers, Courtney Sabino, Julie Sullivan, Emily B Kennedy, Jacob Khouri, Pamela Miller, Eric Lai, Raymond F Schinazi, Wilbur Lam, Nira R Pollock, Anuradha Rao
Abstract

Background: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b was first detected in birds in the United States in 2021 and an ongoing outbreak in dairy cattle began in early 2024. At least 70 U.S. cases have been identified in humans with exposure to infected cattle, poultry, and wild birds. No human-to-human transmission has been documented. However, as part of diagnostic preparedness, we evaluated the ability of currently available influenza tests to detect 2024 U.S. H5N1 strains.
Methods: Contrived nasal swab samples were prepared using live or inactivated 2024 H5N1 and used to test twelve rapid antigen tests (lateral flow assays, or LFA), including 10 commercially-available influenza A LFAs and two H5-specific LFAs. Five point-of-care (POC) molecular assays were also tested. An inclusivity testing protocol was used, wherein a predetermined dilution series is used to evaluate each assay, enabling head-to-head comparison of assay performance.
Results: All lateral flow assays and POC molecular tests were able to detect bovine 2024 H5N1 (genotype B3.13). Sensitivity for the POC molecular tests (heat-inactivated virus) ranged from 1.55 to 7.75 TCID50/swab. For 11/12 LFAs, including 10 commercial influenza A tests and an RUO H5 assay, sensitivity (live virus) ranged from 78-1550 TCID50/swab. Testing of four LFAs confirmed inclusivity for a genotype D1.1 strain.
Conclusions: Available rapid antigen and point-of-care molecular influenza tests can detect 2024 U.S. H5N1 strains in contrived samples, with a wide range of analytical sensitivity. In the event of human-to-human transmission, clinical performance and optimal sample types would need to be established.
Summary: Recent human infections with H5N1 influenza necessitate diagnostic preparedness. Reassuringly, commercially available rapid antigen and point-of-care molecular influenza tests detected the 2024 U.S. bovine H5N1 strain in contrived specimens. Clinical performance should be evaluated if human-to-human transmission is observed.


 
Back
Top Bottom