• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Mayo Clin Proc . Correlations Between COVID-19 Cases and Google Trends Data in the United States: A State-by-State Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Mayo Clin Proc


. 2020 Nov;95(11):2370-2381.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
Correlations Between COVID-19 Cases and Google Trends Data in the United States: A State-by-State Analysis


Shyam J Kurian[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Atiq Ur Rehman Bhatti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohammed Ali Alvi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Henry H Ting[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Curtis Storlie[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Patrick M Wilson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nilay D Shah[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hongfang Liu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mohamad Bydon[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether a digital surveillance model using Google Trends is feasible for obtaining accurate data on coronavirus disease 2019 and whether accurate predictions can be made regarding new cases.
Methods: Data on total and daily new cases in each US state were collected from January 22, 2020, to April 6, 2020. Information regarding 10 keywords was collected from Google Trends, and correlation analyses were performed for individual states as well as for the United States overall.
Results: Among the 10 keywords analyzed from Google Trends, face mask, Lysol, and COVID stimulus check had the strongest correlations when looking at the United States as a whole, with R values of 0.88, 0.82, and 0.79, respectively. Lag and lead Pearson correlations were assessed for every state and all 10 keywords from 16 days before the first case in each state to 16 days after the first case. Strong correlations were seen up to 16 days prior to the first reported cases in some states.
Conclusion: This study documents the feasibility of syndromic surveillance of internet search terms to monitor new infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease 2019. This information could enable better preparation and planning of health care systems.
 
Back
Top Bottom