• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Los Angeles CA: water rationing plan dealt surprise setback

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/dome...Type=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=22&sp=true

L.A. water rationing plan dealt surprise setback

Wed Apr 8, 2009 9:48pm EDT
By Steve Gorman

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Despite dire warnings of water shortages due to prolonged drought, the Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday rejected a plan to ration water in the nation's second-largest city for the first time in 18 years.

The unanimous 15-0 vote against the plan marked a surprise setback for Los Angeles water managers, who like their peers in cities throughout California were directed to cut water use 20 percent this year under a drought emergency proclaimed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But David Nahai, general manager of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, the nation's biggest municipal utility, insisted that the proposal was not dead.

"The city must cut back its water use. There are no two ways about that," Nahai told Reuters after the vote.


He said the council's rejection stemmed not from disagreement over a need for mandatory conservation measures but from questions about how the plan would work and whether it amounted to a rate hike rather than a rationing scheme.

For procedural reasons, he said, the council had no choice but to disapprove the measure for now in order to buy more time to review the matter.

As adopted by the LADWP and endorsed by Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, the plan calls for homes and businesses to pay a penalty rate -- nearly double normal prices -- for any water they used in excess of a reduced monthly allowance.

But Nahai insisted the measure was "revenue neutral," designed entirely to encourage conservation.

The only other time such penalty pricing was imposed in Los Angeles was a year-long rationing system instituted in March 1991, at the height of California's last statewide drought.

The current dry spell, now in its third year, is considered the worst to hit the state since the 1970s.

The Los Angeles rationing plan was to have taken effect by June 1 barring City Council action to block it.

Nahai said he hoped to gain council support for the measure after taking more time to explain the measure to the public.

A spokesman for the mayor, Matt Szabo, said the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which supplies 70 percent of the city's water, would impose rationing on Los Angeles if the city fails to take action itself.


(Editing by Bernie Woodall and Bernard Orr)
 
Back
Top