• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

London flu pandemic could kill 94,000

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/stand...don+flu+pandemic+could+kill+94,000/article.do

London flu pandemic could kill 94,000
Nicholas Cecil, Chief Political Correspondent
15.04.09

EXPERTS are predicting that a London flu pandemic could kill anything from 7,542 people to 94,270 depending on how many ?waves? of infection there are.

A 120-page report drawn up for the London Regional Resilience Flu Pandemic Response Plan warns: ?The pandemic may occur over multiple waves, of which a second or subsequent wave could be more severe than the first.?

The greatest number of fatalities, in the worst case scenario, is likely to be in Croydon at 4,235, followed by Barnet, 4,113, Ealing, 3,810, and Bromley, 3,749. More than 3,000 people may die in Wandsworth, Southwark, Lewisham, Newham, Redbridge, Lambeth, Hillingdon, Enfield and Brent.

The borough-by-borough figures were drawn up using population data, with larger boroughs having a higher mortality toll, as well as ?excess death trends? due to the size of vulnerable groups locally.

Hundreds of thousands of employees are expected to call in sick with others not turning up to work because of fear of being infected. People will be urged to stockpile non-perishable food so that if they fall ill they can minimise contact with others. Victims will be told to stay at home as the virus spreads across the country and could kill up to 750,000 people nationwide.

Experts have already warned that mortuaries will be unable to cope and that hospitals will have to turn ill people away because of the surge in demand.

Schools may be shut as children risk becoming ?super spreaders? of the virus. The document for the pandemic response plan stresses that routine flu vaccinations are unlikely to protect against a new strain of the virus and making available sufficient quantities of an effective vaccine could take six months.

A London flu exercise is due to take place in June to develop the emergency response plan. The emergency blueprint has been approved by the London Regional Resilience Forum
which is co-chaired by London minister Tony McNulty and local government minister John Healey, with Boris Johnson as deputy chairman.

London has seen cases of typhoid, whooping cough and scarlet fever rise by 166 per cent in the past two years and a 214 per cent increase in cases of mumps.
 
Re: London flu pandemic could kill 94,000

London has seen cases of typhoid, whooping cough and scarlet fever rise by 166 per cent in the past two years and a 214 per cent increase in cases of mumps.

One may wonder whether this articles is coming from a newspaper published during XIX century.

Further, the list of ''old'' ailments cited also could suggest how is derelict public health condition for an increasing number of people in United Kingdom suburbs and elsewhere in Europe, since the start of economic recession and decade-long population impoverishment.

I suspect that for some of the most poor the simple ''non-perishable'' food stockpile will probably be unaffordable even in normal societal conditions.

Strong state support for working class population and for the poor in general are urgently needed, as ''welfare state'' is not that ''old heritage'' some neo-monetarist economics experts called in ''gold age''...
 
Back
Top Bottom