• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Logistics and Safety of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in?Medical Retrieval

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print]
Logistics and Safety of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in?Medical Retrieval.

Burns BJ, Habig K, Reid C, Kernick P, Wilkinson C, Tall G, Coombes S, Manning R.

From the Greater Sydney Area Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (BJB, KH, CR, PK, CW, SC), Bankstown, Australia; and Aeromedical and Medical Retrieval Services (GT, RM), Sydney, Australia.
Abstract

Abstract Objective. This article reviews the logistics and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) medical retrieval in New South Wales, Australia. Methods. We describe the logistics involved in ECMO road and rotary-wing retrieval by a multidisciplinary team during the H1N1 influenza epidemic in winter 2009 (i.e., June 1 to August 31, 2009). Basic patient demographics and key retrieval time lines were analyzed. Results. There were 17 patients retrieved on ECMO, with their ages ranging from 22 to 55?years. The median weight was 110 kg. Four critical events were recorded during retrieval, with no adverse outcomes. The retrieval distance varied from 20.8 to 430 km. There were delays in times from retrieval booking to both retrieval tasking and retrieval team departure in 88% of retrievals. The most common reasons cited were ?patient not ready,? 23.5% (4/17); ?vehicle not available,? 23.5% (4/17); and ?complex retrieval,? 41.2% (7/17). The median time (hours:minutes) from booking with the medical retrieval unit (MRU) to tasking was 4:35 (interquartile range [IQR] 3:27?6:15). The median time lag from tasking to departure was 1:00 (IQR 00:10?2:20). The median stabilization time was 1:30 (IQR 1:20?1:55). The median retrieval duration was 7:35 (IQR 5:50?10:15). Conclusion. The process of development of ECMO retrieval was enabled by the preexistence of a high-volume experienced medical retrieval service. Although ECMO retrieval is not a new concept, we describe an entire process for ECMO retrieval that we believe will benefit other retrieval service providers. The increased workload of ECMO retrieval during the swine flu pandemic has led to refinement in the system and process for the future.

PMID: 21294633 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21294633
 
Back
Top Bottom