• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAMA Netw Open . Differences in Medicaid Enrollment and Spending Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JAMA Netw Open


. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2516569.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16569. Differences in Medicaid Enrollment and Spending Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nianyi Hong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Noelia Duchovny[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ru Ding[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article Abstract

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated continuous eligibility policy were associated with lasting changes to Medicaid coverage and spending. These changes for both adults and children should be assessed to better inform policymakers of potential consequences over the long run.
Objective: To compare enrollment and spending patterns for adults and children over the course of 18 months before and during the pandemic.
Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System administrative data to compare cohorts of Medicaid enrollees beginning in February 2018 compared with cohorts beginning in February 2020. Participants included adults and children enrolled in Medicaid in 25 states and the District of Columbia with reliable enrollment and spending data. The data were analyzed between August 31, 2023, and December 9, 2024.
Exposures: The COVID-19 pandemic and Medicaid continuous eligibility policy.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were Medicaid enrollment and mean monthly Medicaid spending for cohorts of adults and children. Trends in enrollment and spending over an 18-month period were compared separately for adults and children. A decomposition was used to quantify the contribution of 2 factors-the share of people with any spending and mean spending among enrollees who had spending-to the observed spending differences across the 2 cohorts.
Results: In month 1 of each cohort, the samples consisted of 12 352 041 adults (7 525 313 female [60.9%]) in the 2018 cohort, 11 998 538 adults (7 370 318 female [61.4%]) in the 2020 cohort, 14 917 138 children (7 367 579 female [49.4%]) in the 2018 cohort, and 14 585 026 children (7 205 186 female [49.4%]) in the 2020 cohort. The mean (SD) age of the 2018 and 2020 adult cohorts was 37.4 (12.4) years at month 1, and the mean (SD) ages of the 2018 and 2020 child cohorts were 8.8 (5.2) years and 9.0 (5.2) years at month 1, respectively. The pandemic and continuous eligibility policy increased the share of adults still enrolled in Medicaid after 18 months by 28 percentage points among adults and by 19 percentage points among children. The pandemic and policy were also associated with lower mean spending compared with a prepandemic cohort. This gap in spending was largest during the first few months of the pandemic with substantial lockdown policies (22 percentage points lower in adults and 36 percentage points lower in children). Finally, additional enrollees in month 18 of the 2020 cohort had spending that was 44% to 58% lower than that of existing enrollees. Although spending rebounded slightly from start of the pandemic, spending after 18 months still lagged below prepandemic levels.
Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, the continuous eligibility policy appeared to be effective at keeping individuals enrolled in Medicaid and additional enrollees had relatively lower spending. Incomplete recovery of spending suggested that crucial care may have been deferred.


 
Back
Top