• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

JAMA Cardiol . Electronic Nudges and Influenza Vaccination Among Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction: Insights From 3 Nationwide Random

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
JAMA Cardiol


. 2024 Nov 17:e244648.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4648. Online ahead of print. Electronic Nudges and Influenza Vaccination Among Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction: Insights From 3 Nationwide Randomized Clinical Trials

Ankeet S Bhatt[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Muthiah Vaduganathan[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Manan Pareek[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Safia Chatur[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Kira Hyldekær Janstrup[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Carsten Schade Larsen[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Lykke Larsen[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Lothar Wiese[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Michael Dalager-Pedersen[SUP] 10 11 [/SUP], Erica L Dueger[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Sandrine Samson[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Rebecca C Harris[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 15 16 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 5 6 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 15 18 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 15 18 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 3 4 16 18 19 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Importance: Influenza vaccination in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) reduces major adverse cardiac events and is strongly recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Effective strategies to improve vaccination are needed in these high-risk patients.
Objective: To evaluate whether electronically delivered behavioral nudges improve influenza vaccine uptake in patients with AMI across 3 nationwide implementation randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
Design, setting, and participants: Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Increasing Influenza Vaccine Uptake (NUDGE-FLU), Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Confirming the Effectiveness of Behavioral Nudges in Increasing Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among Older Adults (NUDGE-FLU-2), and Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Increasing Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among Adults With Chronic Disease (NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC) were RCTs conducted during the 2022 to 2023 and 2023 to 2024 influenza seasons in Denmark. Participants were randomized to either usual care or various behaviorally informed, electronically delivered, letter-based nudges. In a prespecified participant-level pooled meta-analysis, interaction of AMI status on the effects of letter-based nudges vs usual care was examined. Pooled treatment effects were estimated using binomial regression models with identity link, adjustment for trial, and 2-way clustered SEs at the household and participant levels. Effect modification by recency of AMI as a continuous variable was assessed using restricted cubic spline modeling in NUDGE-FLU-CHRONIC.
Interventions: Behaviorally informed, electronically delivered, letter-based nudges or usual care.
Main outcome and measures: The primary end point was influenza vaccination receipt.
Results: Of 2 146 124 individual randomizations (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [11.6] years; 1 114 725 female [51.9%]) across all 3 trials, 59 458 (2.8%) had a history of AMI. Improvement in vaccine uptake was similar in patients with vs without a history of AMI who received any nudge letter compared with usual care (+1.81 vs +1.32 percentage points; P for interaction by AMI status = .09). A letter highlighting the cardiovascular benefits of vaccination (ie, cardiovascular-gain frame) resulted in larger improvements in vaccine uptake among patients with (vs without) a history of AMI (+3.91 vs +2.03 percentage points; P for interaction by AMI status = .002). Among patients with AMI, the benefits of the cardiovascular-gain frame letter were more pronounced in those not vaccinated in the prior season (+13.7 vs +1.48 percentage points; P for interaction <.001). Among younger participants with chronic disease, the cardiovascular-gain frame letter was particularly effective in patients with more recent AMI (P for interaction by continuous recency of AMI <.001).
Conclusions and relevance: Across 3 nationwide RCTs of Danish citizens, messaging emphasizing the cardiovascular benefits of vaccination improved influenza vaccination uptake, with greater benefits observed in patients with a history of AMI. This low-cost, scalable implementation strategy should be considered to encourage influenza vaccination in high-risk patients.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05542004, NCT06030726, NCT06030739.


 
Back
Top Bottom