• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Virol Methods . Syndromic approach to SARS-CoV-2 detection using QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 Panel from clinical samples

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol Methods


. 2021 Sep 22;114300.
doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114300. Online ahead of print.
Syndromic approach to SARS-CoV-2 detection using QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 Panel from clinical samples


Akshita Gupta[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anushika Soni[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sheetalnath Rooge[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Diptanu Paul[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Reshu Agarwal[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bansidhar Tarai[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ekta Gupta[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 panel is a multiplex cartridge based assay based on real time PCR which can detect 17 respiratory viruses, including the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. A syndromic approach is the need of the hour for COVID-19 diagnostics among patients presenting with respiratory symptoms. The present study was done to evaluate 120 archived respiratory clinical specimens for SARS-CoV-2 on the SARS-CoV-2 panel. Further, 27 specimens were tested for other respiratory viruses, in comparison with the BioFire RP1.7 platform. The sensitivity and specificity for SARS-CoV-2 on SARS panel was found to be 90.00% and 100% respectively, indicating good diagnostic accuracy. The positive predictive value was found to be 100%, negative predictive value was found to be 99.93% and accuracy was 99.93%. Detection of other respiratory viruses observed a concordance of 77.7%. Despite advantages of speed, minimal expertise and accurate results; significant costs and discrepancies at Ct >35 remain important limitations of the SARS panel.

Keywords: CBNAAT; COVID-19; Point of care; clinical evaluation; diagnostics.
 
Back
Top Bottom