• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Pediatr . Evaluation of an Influenza Vaccination Program in the Pediatric Emergency Department

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Pediatr


. 2025 Mar 17:114541.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114541. Online ahead of print. Evaluation of an Influenza Vaccination Program in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Amethyst Alayari[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sonja I Ziniel[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ethan Hawkins[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Joan Mackenzie[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Suchitra Rao[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate influenza vaccine administration rate among eligible patients in pediatric emergency departments (ED) following the introduction of a standardized vaccination program.
Study design: We conducted a retrospective study of children ≥6 months of age evaluated in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department (ED) and three affiliated ED sites. Our pre-intervention period was September 2019 through April 2020, and intervention period was September 2020 through April 2023. Our intervention comprised nursing education, standing orders, and a best practice advisory in the electronic health record. Our primary outcome was administration of influenza vaccine in the ED.
Results: There were 51,581 and 144,811 children in the pre-intervention and intervention periods with 64,705 and 172,021 ED encounters, respectively. The intervention increased the odds of vaccination by 15.22 (95% CI 12.39-18.70), from 272 influenza vaccines in the pre-intervention period to 1,892, 2,141, and 755 in the intervention seasons (p < 0.001). During the intervention period, children who received influenza vaccines compared with those who did not were more likely to be older (median 8.5 yrs vs 5.8 yrs), of Black race (8.4% vs 7.2%) or multiple/other race (26.0% vs 19.8%), Hispanic ethnicity (46.0% vs 34.7%), with public insurance (64.3% vs 56.0%), and of lower acuity triage level 4 or 5 (64.2% vs 56.8%), p < 0.001 for all.
Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized influenza vaccination program in the ED can increase vaccination rates, particularly among minority and government-insured children. These interventions can address vaccine disparities and are easily sustainable with potential to reduce the public health burden of influenza.

Keywords: Emergency Department; acute care visits; hospital-based vaccination; influenza vaccination; vaccination; vaccine delivery; vaccines.

 
Back
Top Bottom