• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Unraveling the evolutionary patterns and phylogenomics of coronaviruses: A consensus network approach

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2023 Nov;95(11):e29233.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.29233. Unraveling the evolutionary patterns and phylogenomics of coronaviruses: A consensus network approach

Geng-Ming Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yu-Chen Tai[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chi-Ming Chen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic emphasizes the significance of studying coronaviruses (CoVs). This study investigates the evolutionary patterns of 350 CoVs using four structural proteins (S, E, M, and N) and introduces a consensus methodology to construct a comprehensive phylogenomic network. Our clustering of CoVs into 4 genera is consistent with the current CoV classification. Additionally, we calculate network centrality measures to identify CoV strains with significant average weighted degree and betweenness centrality values, with a specific focus on RaTG13 in the beta genus and NGA/A116E7/2006 in the gamma genus. We compare the phylogenetics of CoVs using our distance-based approach and the character-based model with IQ-TREE. Both methods yield largely consistent outcomes, indicating the reliability of our consensus approach. However, it is worth mentioning that our consensus method achieves an approximate 5000-fold increase in speed compared to IQ-TREE when analyzing the data set of 350 CoVs. This improved efficiency enhances the feasibility of conducting large-scale phylogenomic studies on CoVs.

Keywords: consensus clustering; coronavirus evolution; phylogenomic networks.

 
Back
Top Bottom