• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol. CT imaging features of 4,121 patients with COVI

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol. 2020 Apr 21. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25910. [Epub ahead of print]
CT imaging features of 4,121 patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis.


Zhu J[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhong Z[SUP]1[/SUP], Li H[SUP]1[/SUP], Ji P[SUP]1[/SUP], Pang J[SUP]1[/SUP], Li B[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhang J[SUP]1[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

We systematically reviewed the CT imaging features of COVID-19 in order to provide reference for clinical practice.
METHODS:

Our article comprehensively searched PubMed, FMRS, EMbase, CNKI,WanFang databases and VIP databases to collect literatures about the CT imaging features of COVID-19 from 1 January 2020 to 16 March 2020. Three reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then, this meta-analysis was performed by using Stata12.0 software.
RESULTS:

34 retrospective studies involving a total of 4 121 COVID-19 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that most patients presented bilateral lung involvement (73.8%, 95%CI: 65.9%-81.1%) or multilobar involvement (67.3%,95%CI: 54.8%-78.7 %) and just a little patients showed normal CT findings (8.4%). We found that the most common changes in lesion density was ground-glass opacities (68.1%,95%CI: 56.9%-78.2%). Other changes in density included air bronchogram sign(44.7%), crazy-paving pattern (35.6%) and consolidation (32.0%). Patchy (40.3%), spider web sign (39.5%), cord-like (36.8%) and nodular (20.5%) were common lesion shapes in COVID-19 patients. Pleural thickening (27.1%) was found in some patients. Lymphadenopathy(5.4%) and pleural effusion (5.3%) were rare.
CONCLUSION:

The lung lesions of patients with COVID-19 were mostly bilateral lungs or multilobar involved. The most common chest CT findings were patchy and ground-glass opacities. Some patients had air bronchogram, spider web sign and cord-like. Lymphadenopathy and pleural effusion were rare. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

Computed tomography; Coronavirus disease 2019; Imaging features; Meta-analysis; Pneumonia; Systematical review


PMID:32314805DOI:10.1002/jmv.25910
 
Back
Top