• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Med Virol . Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Med Virol


. 2022 Nov 21.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.28326. Online ahead of print.
Comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants


Chon Phin Ong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zi-Wei Ye[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kaiming Tang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ronghui Liang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yubin Xie[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hongzhuo Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhenzhi Qin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Haoran Sun[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tong-Yun Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yun Cheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hin Chu[SUP] 2 4 3 [/SUP], Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan[SUP] 2 4 3 5 [/SUP], Dong-Yan Jin[SUP] 1 4 5 [/SUP], Shuofeng Yuan[SUP] 2 4 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants, BA.1 and BA.2, are being progressively displaced by BA.5 in many countries. To provide insight on the replacement of BA.2 by BA.5 as the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant, we performed a comparative analysis of Omicron BA.2.12.1 and BA.5.2 variants in cell culture and hamster models. We found that BA.5.2 exhibited enhanced replicative kinetics over BA.2.12.1 in vitro and in vivo, which is evidenced by the dominant BA.5.2 viral genome detected at different time points, regardless of immune selection pressure with vaccine-induced serum antibodies. Utilising reverse genetics, we constructed a mutant SARS-CoV-2 carrying spike F486V substitution, which is an uncharacterized mutation that concurrently discriminates Omicron BA.5.2 from BA.2.12.1 variant. We noticed that the 486[SUP]th[/SUP] residue does not confer viral replication advantage to the virus. We also found that 486V displayed generally reduced immune evasion capacity when compared with its predecessor, 486F. However, the surge of fitness in BA.5.2 over BA.2.12.1 was not due to stand-alone F486V substitution but as a result of combination of multiple mutations. Our study upholds the urgency for continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants with enhanced replication fitness. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Keywords: BA.2.12.1; BA.5.2; F486V; Neutralising antibodies; Reverse genetics.
 
Back
Top Bottom