• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Public Health . Apparent and occult infections of medical staff in a COVID-19 designated hospital

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Public Health


. 2020 Jul 14;S1876-0341(20)30571-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.005. Online ahead of print.
Apparent and occult infections of medical staff in a COVID-19 designated hospital


Guozhen Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Caiying Hu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qiong He[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jing Liu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nian Xiong[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Haizhou Wang[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia (COVID-19), numerous medical staff are fighting on the frontline. However, the possibility of occult infection in medical staff is ignored in many recent studies. Herein, we collected data in a COVID-19 designated hospital from January 22, 2020 to March 10, 2020. A total of 33 medical staff had at least one nucleic acid test of throat swab, immunoglobulin G (IgG) or IgM serum antibody test, and chest computed tomography (CT), were enrolled. Finally, we identified 25 cases (75.8%) were isolated for hospitalized treatment after positive virus detection. In addition, 4 cases who were all negative for nucleic acid test detection with no clinical symptoms, and none of their chest CT were abnormal. However, the results of serum IgG or IgM antibody test in these 4 cases were positive, suggesting the presence of occult infection. In conclusion, data from our single center indicated that SARS-CoV-2 had a high medical infection rate (29/33 = 87.9%) and might have a potential risk of occult infection.

Keywords: COVID-19; Medical staff; Occult infection; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom