• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis. Longitudinal Change of SARS-Cov2 Antibodies in Patients with COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis. 2020 May 2. pii: jiaa229. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa229. [Epub ahead of print]
Longitudinal Change of SARS-Cov2 Antibodies in Patients with COVID-19.


Zhang G[SUP]1[/SUP], Nie S[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhang Z[SUP]1[/SUP], Zhang Z[SUP]1[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has recently emerged and caused the rapid spread of COVID-19 worldwide.
METHODS:

We did a retrospective study and included COVID-19 patients admitted to Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University between February 1 and February 29, 2020. Antibody assay was conducted to detect COVID-19 envelope protein E and nucleocapsid protein N antigen.
RESULTS:

112 patients were recruited with symptoms of fever, cough, fatigue, myalgia, and diarrhoea. All patients underwent antibody tests. Fifty-eight (51.79%) were positive for both IgM and IgG, 7 (6.25%) were negative for both antibodies, 1 (0.89%) was positive for only IgM, and 46 (41.07%) were positive for only IgG. IgM antibody appeared within a week post disease onset, and lasted for one month and gradually decreased, while IgG antibody was produced 10 days after infection, and lasted for a longer time. However, no significant difference in level of IgM and IgG antibody between positive and negative patients of nucleic acid test after treatment was found.
CONCLUSIONS:

Our results indicate that serological tests could be powerful approach for the early diagnosis of COVID-19.
? The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibody; humoral immunity; serological test


PMID:32358956DOI:10.1093/infdis/jiaa229
 
Back
Top