• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis. Efficacy of Inactivated Split-Virus Influenza Vaccine against Culture-Confirmed Influenza in Healthy Adults: A Prospective, Randomized,

Giuseppe

Emeritus
J Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 15;200(12):1861-1869.

Efficacy of Inactivated Split-Virus Influenza Vaccine against Culture-Confirmed Influenza in Healthy Adults: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Beran J, Vesikari T, Wertzova V, Karvonen A, Honegr K, Lindblad N, Van Belle P, Peeters M, Innis BL, Devaster JM. - The Vaccination and Travel Medicine Center and 2Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic; 3Vaccine Research Center, University of Tampere, Finland; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, 4Rixensart, Belgium, and 5King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

Background.
A new trivalent inactivated split-virus influenza vaccine (TIV) was recently introduced in the United States. We assessed the efficacy of TIV against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B.

Methods.
In this double-blind trial conducted from September 2006 to May 2007 in the Czech Republic and Finland, participants aged 18-64 years were randomized to receive 1 dose of TIV ([Formula: see text]) or placebo ([Formula: see text]). Influenza-like illnesses (ILI) (defined as at least 1 systemic symptom [fever {oral temperature, 37.8 degrees C} and/or myalgia] and at least 1 respiratory symptom [cough and/or sore throat]) were identified by both active (biweekly phone contact) and passive surveillance. Nasal and throat swab specimens were collected for viral culture.

Results.
The attack rate for culture-confirmed ILI was 3.2% in the placebo group, with most strains identified as influenza A (all except 1 were H3N2) matching the vaccine strain. There were 6 cases of influenza B, all of which were of a different lineage (Yamagata) than the vaccine strain. Vaccine efficacy against culture-confirmed influenza A and/or B due to strains antigenically matched to the vaccine was 66.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51.9%-77.4%; [Formula: see text]) and to any strain was 61.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-72.8%; [Formula: see text]).

Conclusion.
TIV is efficacious against culture-confirmed influenza in healthy adults.

Trial Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00363870 .

PMID: 19909082 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

-
------
 
Back
Top Bottom