• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis . Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels Associated With COVID-19 Protection in Outpatients Tested for SARS-CoV-2, US Flu Vaccine Effectivene

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis


. 2024 Jul 25;230(1):45-54.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae090. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Levels Associated With COVID-19 Protection in Outpatients Tested for SARS-CoV-2, US Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network, October 2021-June 2022

Kelsey M Sumner[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Ruchi Yadav[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Emma K Noble[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Ryan Sandford[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Devyani Joshi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sara Y Tartof[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Karen J Wernli[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Emily T Martin[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Manjusha Gaglani[SUP] 8 9 10 [/SUP], Richard K Zimmerman[SUP] 11 [/SUP], H Keipp Talbot[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Carlos G Grijalva[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Edward A Belongia[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Jessie R Chung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eric Rogier[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Melissa M Coughlin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brendan Flannery[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: We assessed associations between binding antibody (bAb) concentration <5 days from symptom onset and testing positive for COVID-19 among patients in a test-negative study.
Methods: From October 2021 to June 2022, study sites in 7 states enrolled patients aged ≥6 months presenting with acute respiratory illness. Respiratory specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2. In blood specimens, we measured concentrations of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against the spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid antigens from the ancestral strain in standardized bAb units (BAU). Percentage change in odds of COVID-19 by increasing anti-RBD bAb was estimated via logistic regression as (1 - adjusted odds ratio of COVID-19) × 100, adjusting for COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses, age, site, and high-risk exposure.
Results: Out of 2018 symptomatic patients, 662 (33%) tested positive for acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Geometric mean RBD bAb levels were lower among COVID-19 cases than SARS-CoV-2 test-negative controls during the Delta-predominant period (112 vs 498 BAU/mL) and Omicron-predominant period (823 vs 1189 BAU/mL). Acute-phase ancestral spike RBD bAb levels associated with 50% lower odds of COVID-19 were 1968 BAU/mL against Delta and 3375 BAU/mL against Omicron; thresholds may differ in other laboratories.
Conclusions: During acute illness, antibody concentrations against ancestral spike RBD were associated with protection against COVID-19.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2 infection; antibodies; correlates of protection.

 
Back
Top Bottom