• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Dis. A randomized trial of candidate inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccines in children aged 3?17 yea

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Dis. (2013) doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit091

A randomized trial of candidate inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine versus trivalent influenza vaccines in children aged 3?17 years

J.B. Domachowske1,
H. Pankow-Culot2,
M. Bautista3,
Y. Feng4,
C. Claeys4,
M. Peeters4,
B.L. Innis5 and
V. Jain5

1Department of Pediatrics, Golisano Children's Hospital, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse NY USA
2Pediatric Office, Heiligenhaus, Germany
3University of the East Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center Inc., Quezon City, Philippines
4GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, Wavre, Belgium
5GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines, King of Prussia, PA, USA

Corresponding Author: Dr. Joseph Domachowske MD, Address: Upstate Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, Tel: +001-315-464-7577, Fax: +001-315-464-7564, E-mail: domachoj{at}upstate.edu

Abstract

Background. Two antigenically distinct influenza B lineages have co-circulated since 2001, yet trivalent influenza vaccines (TIV) contain one influenza B antigen, meaning lineage-mismatch with the vaccine is frequent. We assessed a candidate inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) containing both B lineages versus TIV in healthy children aged 3?17 years.

Methods. Children were randomized 1:1:1 to receive QIV or one of two TIVs (either B/Victoria or B/Yamagata lineage) (N=2738). Hemagglutination-inhibition assays were performed 28-days after one or two doses in primed and unprimed children, respectively. Immunological non-inferiority of QIV versus TIV against shared strains, and superiority against alternate-lineage B strains was based on GMTs and seroconversion rates. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed. NCT01196988

Results. Non-inferiority against shared strains and superiority against alternate-lineage B strains was demonstrated for QIV versus TIV. QIV was highly immunogenic; seroconversion rates were 91.4%, 72.3%, 70.0%, and 72.5% against A/H1N1, A/H3N2, B/Victoria, and B/Yamagata, respectively. Reactogenicity and safety of QIV was consistent with TIV.

Conclusions. QIV versus TIV showed superior immunogenicity for the additional B strain without interfering with immune responses to shared strains. QIV may offer improved protection against influenza B in children compared with current trivalent vaccines.


http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/03/06/infdis.jit091.abstract
 
Back
Top Bottom