• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Infect Chemother . Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification by RT-LAMP compared to RT-qPCR

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Infect Chemother


. 2021 May 11;S1341-321X(21)00133-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.05.004. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification by RT-LAMP compared to RT-qPCR


Kenta Minami[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ryota Masutani[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Youichi Suzuki[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Meri Kubota[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Naofumi Osaka[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Toyofumi Nakanishi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Takashi Nakano[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Akira Ukimura[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic caused by a novel virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The viral load of SARS-CoV-2 is associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients. Measurement of viral load requires the use of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), which in turn requires advanced equipment and techniques. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the viral load measurement using reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), which is a simpler procedure compared to RT-qPCR.
Materials and methods: RNA was extracted by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit. The RT-LAMP assay was performed by using the Loopamp? 2019-SARS-CoV-2 detection reagent kit and 10-fold serial dilutions of known viral load RT-LAMP were used to measure Tt, which is the time until the turbidity exceeds the threshold. Based on the relationship between viral load and Tt, the linearity and detection sensitivity of the calibration curve were evaluated. In addition, 117 clinical specimens were measured, and RT-qPCR and RT-LAMP assay results were compared.
Results: The dilution linearity of the calibration curve was maintained at five orders of magnitude 1.0? 10[SUP]6[/SUP] to 1.0 ? 10[SUP]1[/SUP] copies/?L, and was confirmed to be detectable down to 1.0 ? 10[SUP]0[/SUP] copies/?L. The limit of quantification of RNA extracted from clinical specimens using RT-LAMP correlated well with that obtained using RT-qPCR (r[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.930).
Conclusion: The findings indicate that RT-LAMP is an effective method to determine the viral load of SARS-CoV-2.

Keywords: COVID-19; Quantitative; RT-LAMP; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
 
Back
Top Bottom