tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Glob Health
. 2024 Sep 6:14:05025.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.05025. Effects of rehabilitation interventions for old adults with long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Jie Deng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chenyuan Qin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Minjung Lee[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yubin Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Myoungsoon You[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Jue Liu[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of the existing rehabilitation interventions for old adults with long coronavirus disease (COVID), which is of particular concern among old adults.
Methods: We systematically searched studies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to 15 November 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared rehabilitation interventions with other controls in old adults (mean/median age of 60 or older) with long COVID were included. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of the rehabilitation interventions with the common control group. Mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as summary statistics. Moreover, subgroup analyses based on the intervention programmes, the severity of acute infection, and the age of participants were carried out.
Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 832 participants (64.37 ± 7.94 years, 52.2% were men) were included in the analysis. Compared with the control groups, rehabilitation interventions significantly improved 6-minute walking test (6 MWT; MD = 15.77 metres (m), 95% CI = 5.40, 26.13, P < 0.01), 30-second sit-to-stand test (MD = 4.11 number of stands
, 95% CI = 2.46, 5.76, P < 0.001), all aspects of quality of life, independence in activities of daily living (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14, 0.48, P < 0.001), and relieved fatigue (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI = -1.13, -0.19, P < 0.01), depression (SMD = -0.89, 95% CI = -1.76, -0.02, P < 0.05) and anxiety (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.58, -0.05, P < 0.05). However, the improvement of hand grip strength and pulmonary function was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that improvements in 6 MWT, fatigue, anxiety, and depression were more pronounced in old patients who received exercise training, while those who received respiratory rehabilitation had more pronounced improvements in pulmonary function and quality of life.
Conclusions: Old adults with long COVID who underwent rehabilitation interventions experienced significant improvement in functional capacity, fatigue, quality of life, independence in activities of daily living, and mental health outcomes compared with usual/standard care. These findings suggest that screening, management, and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID in older adults should be strengthened to improve their complete health status and functional status, thereby reducing the long-term disease burden caused by long COVID and fostering healthy aging during the post-pandemic era.
. 2024 Sep 6:14:05025.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.05025. Effects of rehabilitation interventions for old adults with long COVID: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Jie Deng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Chenyuan Qin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Minjung Lee[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yubin Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Myoungsoon You[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Jue Liu[SUP] 1 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39238359
- PMCID: PMC11377967
- DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.05025
Background: There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of the existing rehabilitation interventions for old adults with long coronavirus disease (COVID), which is of particular concern among old adults.
Methods: We systematically searched studies published in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from their inception to 15 November 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) compared rehabilitation interventions with other controls in old adults (mean/median age of 60 or older) with long COVID were included. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of the rehabilitation interventions with the common control group. Mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with its 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as summary statistics. Moreover, subgroup analyses based on the intervention programmes, the severity of acute infection, and the age of participants were carried out.
Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 832 participants (64.37 ± 7.94 years, 52.2% were men) were included in the analysis. Compared with the control groups, rehabilitation interventions significantly improved 6-minute walking test (6 MWT; MD = 15.77 metres (m), 95% CI = 5.40, 26.13, P < 0.01), 30-second sit-to-stand test (MD = 4.11 number of stands
, 95% CI = 2.46, 5.76, P < 0.001), all aspects of quality of life, independence in activities of daily living (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.14, 0.48, P < 0.001), and relieved fatigue (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI = -1.13, -0.19, P < 0.01), depression (SMD = -0.89, 95% CI = -1.76, -0.02, P < 0.05) and anxiety (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI = -1.58, -0.05, P < 0.05). However, the improvement of hand grip strength and pulmonary function was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that improvements in 6 MWT, fatigue, anxiety, and depression were more pronounced in old patients who received exercise training, while those who received respiratory rehabilitation had more pronounced improvements in pulmonary function and quality of life.Conclusions: Old adults with long COVID who underwent rehabilitation interventions experienced significant improvement in functional capacity, fatigue, quality of life, independence in activities of daily living, and mental health outcomes compared with usual/standard care. These findings suggest that screening, management, and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID in older adults should be strengthened to improve their complete health status and functional status, thereby reducing the long-term disease burden caused by long COVID and fostering healthy aging during the post-pandemic era.