• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Geriatr Oncol . Serological response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer older than 80 years

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Geriatr Oncol


. 2021 Jun 11;S1879-4068(21)00136-3.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.06.002. Online ahead of print.
Serological response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer older than 80 years


Daniela Iacono[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Linda Cerbone[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lucia Palombi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Elena Cavalieri[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Isabella Sperduti[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rosario Andrea Cocchiara[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Bruno Mariani[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Gabriella Parisi[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Carlo Garufi[SUP] 7 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Central studies carried out on vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV2) excluded patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and those diagnosed with an immunosuppressive condition. Moreover, there are no data on vaccine efficacy regarding older patients with cancer.
Objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the seroprevalence of the SARS-CoV2 IgG in older patients (aged ≥80 years) diagnosed with solid or hematological malignancies, one month after administering the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.
Materials and methods: We screened 74 older patients with cancer, 45 of them accepted to receive the vaccination and collected serum samples from 36 patients; a group of medical doctors and nurses from our hospital was used as a control in a 1:2 ratio.
Results: The median age was 82 years (range 80-89). Median serum IgG were 2396,10 AU/ml (range 0-32,763,00) in patients with cancer and 8737,49 AU/ml (398.90-976,280,00) in the control group, p < 0.0001. Additional subgroup analyses were performed comparing males and females, patients treated with chemotherapy versus other therapies (immunotherapy, targeted therapy), solid tumors versus hematological malignancies, early (I-II) versus advanced (III-IV) stage of disease, continuative corticosteroid use or not. None of them reached statistical significance.
Conclusion: Our study shows for the first time that patients with cancer aged ≥80 years can have a serological response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine one month after vaccination and consequently support the vaccination campaign currently underway in this frail population.
 
Back
Top Bottom