tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Gen Intern Med
. 2021 Jan 13.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06345-5. Online ahead of print.
Is Lockdown Effective in Limiting SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic Progression?-a Cross-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Epidemiokinetic Tools
Bruno M?garbane[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fanchon Bourasset[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Jean-Michel Scherrmann[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: To date, the risk/benefit balance of lockdown in controlling severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic is controversial.
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of lockdown on SARS-CoV-2 epidemic progression in nine different countries (New Zealand, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, the UK, Sweden, and the USA).
Design: We conducted a cross-country comparative evaluation using a susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR)-based model completed with pharmacokinetic approaches.
Main measures: The rate of new daily SARS-CoV-2 cases in the nine countries was calculated from the World Health Organization's published data. Using a SIR-based model, we determined the infection (β) and recovery (γ) rate constants; their corresponding half-lives (t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] and t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB]); the basic reproduction numbers (R[SUB]0[/SUB] as β/γ); the rates of susceptible S(t), infected I(t), and recovered R(t) compartments; and the effectiveness of lockdown. Since this approach requires the epidemic termination to build the (I) compartment, we determined S(t) at an early epidemic stage using simple linear regressions.
Key results: In New Zealand, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK, early-onset stay-at-home orders and restrictions followed by gradual deconfinement allowed rapid reduction in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] ≤ 14 days) with R[SUB]0[/SUB] ≤ 1.5 and rapid recovery (t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB] ≤ 18 days). By contrast, in Sweden (no lockdown) and the USA (heterogeneous state-dependent lockdown followed by abrupt deconfinement scenarios), a prolonged plateau of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (terminal t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] of 23 and 40 days, respectively) with elevated R[SUB]0[/SUB] (4.9 and 4.4, respectively) and non-ending recovery (terminal t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB] of 112 and 179 days, respectively) was observed.
Conclusions: Early-onset lockdown with gradual deconfinement allowed shortening the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and reducing contaminations. Lockdown should be considered as an effective public health intervention to halt epidemic progression.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; epidemic; lockdown; modeling; pharmacokinetics.
. 2021 Jan 13.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06345-5. Online ahead of print.
Is Lockdown Effective in Limiting SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic Progression?-a Cross-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Epidemiokinetic Tools
Bruno M?garbane[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Fanchon Bourasset[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Jean-Michel Scherrmann[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33442818
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06345-5
Abstract
Background: To date, the risk/benefit balance of lockdown in controlling severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic is controversial.
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of lockdown on SARS-CoV-2 epidemic progression in nine different countries (New Zealand, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, the UK, Sweden, and the USA).
Design: We conducted a cross-country comparative evaluation using a susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR)-based model completed with pharmacokinetic approaches.
Main measures: The rate of new daily SARS-CoV-2 cases in the nine countries was calculated from the World Health Organization's published data. Using a SIR-based model, we determined the infection (β) and recovery (γ) rate constants; their corresponding half-lives (t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] and t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB]); the basic reproduction numbers (R[SUB]0[/SUB] as β/γ); the rates of susceptible S(t), infected I(t), and recovered R(t) compartments; and the effectiveness of lockdown. Since this approach requires the epidemic termination to build the (I) compartment, we determined S(t) at an early epidemic stage using simple linear regressions.
Key results: In New Zealand, France, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy, and the UK, early-onset stay-at-home orders and restrictions followed by gradual deconfinement allowed rapid reduction in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] ≤ 14 days) with R[SUB]0[/SUB] ≤ 1.5 and rapid recovery (t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB] ≤ 18 days). By contrast, in Sweden (no lockdown) and the USA (heterogeneous state-dependent lockdown followed by abrupt deconfinement scenarios), a prolonged plateau of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals (terminal t[SUB]1/2β[/SUB] of 23 and 40 days, respectively) with elevated R[SUB]0[/SUB] (4.9 and 4.4, respectively) and non-ending recovery (terminal t[SUB]1/2γ[/SUB] of 112 and 179 days, respectively) was observed.
Conclusions: Early-onset lockdown with gradual deconfinement allowed shortening the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and reducing contaminations. Lockdown should be considered as an effective public health intervention to halt epidemic progression.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; epidemic; lockdown; modeling; pharmacokinetics.