tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol
. 2020 Dec 5;135:104713.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104713. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?
Tuna Toptan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa Eckermann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Annika E Pfeiffer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sebastian Hoehl[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sandra Ciesek[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christian Drosten[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Victor M Corman[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can spread from symptomatic patients with COVID-19, but also from asymptomatic individuals. Therefore, robust surveillance and timely interventions are essential for the control of virus spread within the community. In this regard the frequency of testing and speed of reporting, but not the test sensitivity alone, play a crucial role.
Objectives: In order to reduce the costs and meet the expanding demands in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2, complementary assays, such as rapid antigen tests, have been developed. Rigorous analysis under varying conditions is required to assess the clinical performance of these tests and to ensure reproducible results.
Results: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a recently licensed rapid antigen test using 137 clinical samples in two institutions. Test sensitivity was between 88.2-89.6 % when applied to samples with viral loads typically seen in infectious patients. Of 32 rRT-PCR positive samples, 19 demonstrated infectivity in cell culture, and 84 % of these samples were reactive with the antigen test. Seven full-genome sequenced SARS-CoV-2 isolates and SARS-CoV-1 were detected with this antigen test, with no cross-reactivity against other common respiratory viruses.
Conclusions: Numerous antigen tests are available for SARS-CoV-2 testing and their performance to detect infectious individuals may vary. Head-to-head comparison along with cell culture testing for infectivity may prove useful to identify better performing antigen tests. The antigen test analyzed in this study is easy-to-use, inexpensive, and scalable. It can be helpful in monitoring infection trends and thus has potential to reduce transmission.
Keywords: Antigen test; Point-of-care testing; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Surveillance.
. 2020 Dec 5;135:104713.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104713. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?
Tuna Toptan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lisa Eckermann[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Annika E Pfeiffer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sebastian Hoehl[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sandra Ciesek[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Christian Drosten[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Victor M Corman[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33352470
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104713
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can spread from symptomatic patients with COVID-19, but also from asymptomatic individuals. Therefore, robust surveillance and timely interventions are essential for the control of virus spread within the community. In this regard the frequency of testing and speed of reporting, but not the test sensitivity alone, play a crucial role.
Objectives: In order to reduce the costs and meet the expanding demands in real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) testing for SARS-CoV-2, complementary assays, such as rapid antigen tests, have been developed. Rigorous analysis under varying conditions is required to assess the clinical performance of these tests and to ensure reproducible results.
Results: We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of a recently licensed rapid antigen test using 137 clinical samples in two institutions. Test sensitivity was between 88.2-89.6 % when applied to samples with viral loads typically seen in infectious patients. Of 32 rRT-PCR positive samples, 19 demonstrated infectivity in cell culture, and 84 % of these samples were reactive with the antigen test. Seven full-genome sequenced SARS-CoV-2 isolates and SARS-CoV-1 were detected with this antigen test, with no cross-reactivity against other common respiratory viruses.
Conclusions: Numerous antigen tests are available for SARS-CoV-2 testing and their performance to detect infectious individuals may vary. Head-to-head comparison along with cell culture testing for infectivity may prove useful to identify better performing antigen tests. The antigen test analyzed in this study is easy-to-use, inexpensive, and scalable. It can be helpful in monitoring infection trends and thus has potential to reduce transmission.
Keywords: Antigen test; Point-of-care testing; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Surveillance.