• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

J Clin Virol. Comparison of four new commercial serologic assays for determination of SARS-CoV-2 IgG

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Virol. 2020 Apr 29;128:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104394. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of four new commercial serologic assays for determination of SARS-CoV-2 IgG.


Kr?ttgen A[SUP]1[/SUP], Cornelissen CG[SUP]2[/SUP], Dreher M[SUP]2[/SUP], Hornef M[SUP]3[/SUP], Im?hl M[SUP]1[/SUP], Kleines M[SUP]4[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Facing the ongoing pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there is an urgent need for serological assays identifying individuals with past coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
STUDY DESIGN:

Our study is the first to compare four new commercially available assays using 75 sera from patients tested positive or negative by SARS-CoV-2 PCR: the anti SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun, Germany), the EDI New Coronavirus COVID-19 IgG ELISA, (Epitope diagnostics (EDI), USA), the recomWell SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA (Mikrogen, Germany), and the SARS-CoV-2 Virachip IgG (Viramed, Germany).
RESULTS:

We found a sensitivity of 86.4 %, 100 %, 86.4 %, and 77.3 % and a specificity of 96,2 %, 88,7 %, 100 %, and 100 % for the Euroimmun assay, the EDI assay, the Mikrogen assay, and the Viramed assay, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:

Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays have a sufficient specificity and sensitivity for identifying individuals with past SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Copyright ? 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.



KEYWORDS:

COVID-19; ELISA; SARS-CoV-2


PMID:32416599DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104394
 
Back
Top Bottom