• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

iScience . MERS-CoV spike vaccine-induced N-terminal domain-specific antibodies are more protective than receptor binding domain-specific antibodie

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
iScience


. 2024 Dec 18;28(2):111632.
doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111632. eCollection 2025 Feb 21. MERS-CoV spike vaccine-induced N-terminal domain-specific antibodies are more protective than receptor binding domain-specific antibodies

Olubukola M Abiona[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nianshuang Wang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sarah R Leist[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alexandra Schäfer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Adam S Cockrell[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Lingshu Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sandhya Bangaru[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Laura Stevens[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Rachel L Graham[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jacob F Kocher[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yaroslav Tsybovsky[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Masaru Kanekiyo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Azad Kumar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kaitlyn M Morabito[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Osnat Rosen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wei Shi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anne Werner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yi Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cynthia Ziwawo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Christian K O Dzuvor[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Charis Palandjian[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Connor Eastman[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Hannah R Matthews[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Jeswin Joseph[SUP] 7 [/SUP], James D Chappell[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Wing-Pui Kong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John R Mascola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrew B Ward[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mark R Denison[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ralph Baric[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jason S McLellan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Barney S Graham[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kizzmekia S Corbett-Helaire[SUP] 1 7 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic underscores the need to prepare for future emerging coronavriuses (CoVs) by understanding the principles behind effective CoV vaccine design such as protective immunity and antibody responses. To study which epitopes and subdomains contribute to in vivo protection, we utilized the prefusion-stabilized spike protein of MERS-CoV, MERS S-2P, as a vaccine immunogen. Vaccination with MERS S-2P elicited both receptor-binding domain (RBD)- and non-RBD-specific antibodies, including N-terminal domain (NTD)-specific G2-and CDC2-A2-like antibodies. Intriguingly, the immunogen MERS S-2P_ΔRBD, MERS S-2P with the RBDs removed, protects comparably to S1 and S-2P immunogens against MERS-CoV challenge. Moreover, passive transfer studies of polyclonal IgG from MERS S-2P immunized mice depleted of subdomain-specific antibodies demonstrated that non-RBD antibodies protected more than non-NTD antibodies. Altogether, these findings illustrate that in-vivo protection is not solely driven by RBD-specific antibodies and highlights the importance of targeting non-RBD sites in future CoV vaccine designs.

Keywords: Immunity; Immunology; Virology.

 
Back
Top